The DOI matches its Crossref record; 6 of the 6 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Designing Games for Distributed Optimization
Abstract
The central goal in multiagent systems is to design local control laws for the individual agents to ensure that the emergent global behavior is desirable with respect to a given system level objective. Ideally, a system designer seeks to satisfy this goal while conditioning each agent's control law on the least amount of information possible. This paper focuses on achieving this goal using the field of game theory. In particular, we derive a systematic methodology for designing local agent objective functions that guarantees (i) an equivalence between the resulting Nash equilibria and the optimizers of the system level objective and (ii) that the resulting game possesses an inherent structure that can be exploited in distributed learning, e.g., potential games. The control design can then be completed utilizing any distributed learning algorithm which guarantees convergence to a Nash equilibrium for the attained game structure. Furthermore, in many settings the resulting controllers will be inherently robust to a host of uncertainties including asynchronous clock rates, delays in information, and component failures.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Boyd, S., Parikh, N., Chu, E., Peleato, B., & Eckstein, J. (2011) · Foundations and Trends® in Machine Learning · doi:10.1561/2200000016 · Cited by 17,075
Consensus and Cooperation in Networked Multi-Agent Systems
Olfati-Saber, R., Fax, J. A., & Murray, R. M. (2007) · Proceedings of the IEEE · doi:10.1109/jproc.2006.887293 · Cited by 10,522 · cited 1×
“[23]–[28], consensus based methods [2], [3], [29], [30], or two-”
MethodCoordination of groups of mobile autonomous agents using nearest neighbor rules
Jadbabaie, A., Lin, J., & Morse, A. S. (2003) · IEEE Transactions on Automatic Control · doi:10.1109/tac.2003.812781 · Cited by 8,339
17. A Value for n-Person Games
Shapley, L. S. (1953) · Contributions to the Theory of Games (AM-28), Volume II · doi:10.1515/9781400881970-018 · Cited by 6,950
Distributed asynchronous deterministic and stochastic gradient optimization algorithms
Tsitsiklis, J., Bertsekas, D., & Athans, M. (1986) · IEEE Transactions on Automatic Control · doi:10.1109/tac.1986.1104412 · Cited by 1,967
Distributed Subgradient Methods for Convex Optimization Over Random Networks
Lobel, I., & Ozdaglar, A. (2011) · IEEE Transactions on Automatic Control · doi:10.1109/tac.2010.2091295 · Cited by 351
Cited by
Distributed Nash equilibrium seeking for aggregative games with coupled constraints
Liang, S., Yi, P., & Hong, Y. (2017) · Automatica · doi:10.1016/j.automatica.2017.07.064 · Cited by 328
Metadata
- Authors
- Li, N., & Marden, J. R.
- Venue
- IEEE Journal of Selected Topics in Signal Processing
- Published
- 2013-04
- Volume
- 7
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 230-242
- ISSN
- 1932-4553 (ISSN-L)
- 1941-0484
- OpenAlex
- W1972768959
- Cited by
- 290
- References
- 6
- FWCI
- 26.43
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Designing Games for Distributed Optimization. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1109/jstsp.2013.2246511
- The paper
- Li, N., & Marden, J. R. (2013). Designing Games for Distributed Optimization. IEEE Journal of Selected Topics in Signal Processing. https://doi.org/10.1109/jstsp.2013.2246511
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.