Cited by 45Wireless Communication Security TechniquesAdvanced Authentication Protocols SecurityWireless Body Area Networks

Secure stochastic ECG signals based on gaussian mixture model for e-healthcare systems

Wang, Wei, Wang, Honggang, Hempel, Michael, Peng, Dongming, Sharif, Hamid, Chen, Hsiao-Hwa·2011·IEEE Systems Journal

Abstract

The blood circulation system in a human body provides a unique and natural trust zone for secure data communications in wireless healthcare systems such as body area networks. Unfortunately, biometric signal authentication using physiological attributes in wireless healthcare has not been extensively studied. In this paper, we propose a data authentication approach utilizing electrocardiography (ECG) signal patterns for reducing key exchange overhead. The major contribution of this research is to apply stochastic pattern recognition techniques in wireless healthcare. In the proposed approach, the inter-pulse interval (IPI) signal pattern at transmitter side is summarized as a biometric authentication key using Gaussian mixture model (GMM). At the receiver side, a light-weight signature verification scheme is adopted that uses IPI signals gathered locally at the receiver. The proposed authentication scheme has the advantage of high sample misalignment tolerance. In our earlier work, we had demonstrated the concept of stochastic authentication for ECG signal, but the signature verification process and GMM authentication performance under time synchronization and various sample points were not discussed. Here, we present a new set of analytical and experimental results to demonstrate that the proposed stochastic authentication approach achieves a low half total error rate in ECG signals verification.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1109/jsyst.2011.2165597

Cites

32 of 32 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Wang, W., Wang, H., Hempel, M., Peng, D., Sharif, H., & Chen, H.-H.
Affiliations
  • South Dakota State University (US)
  • University of Massachusetts Dartmouth (US)
  • University of Nebraska–Lincoln (US)
  • National Cheng Kung University (TW)
Venue
IEEE Systems Journal
Published
2011-12
Volume
5
Issue
4
Pages
564-573
ISSN
1932-8184 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2105449668
Cited by
45
References
32
Citations by year
2023: 1 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 3 · 2020: 4 · 2019: 7 · 2018: 3 · 2017: 5 · 2016: 6 · 2015: 5 · 2014: 7 · 2013: 1 · 2012: 1
FWCI
2.02
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
IEEE Systems Journal (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Electrical and Electronic Engineering › Wireless Communication Security Techniques
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Networks and Communications › Advanced Authentication Protocols Security
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Biomedical Engineering › Wireless Body Area Networks
Keywords
Gaussian mixture model, biometric authentication, interpulse interval, signature verification, body area networks, wireless healthcare, e-healthcare security, clock synchronization

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review