Cited by 39Electric Vehicles and InfrastructureSmart Grid Energy ManagementElectric Power System Optimization

EV Scheduling Framework for Peak Demand Management in LV Residential Networks

Open access
Rafique, Sohaib, Nizami, Mohammad Sohrab Hasan, Irshad, Usama Bin, Hossain, Mohammad Jahangir, Mukhopadhyay, Subhas Chandra·2022·IEEE Systems Journal

Abstract

Increased electrification in the residential and transport sectors is changing the energy demand profiles significantly, which results in reshaped peak demand. These changes in demand profiles can cause grid overloading and jeopardize network reliability especially when the excessive use of electricity within a network is uncoordinated. In this article, an aggregated coordination mechanism is proposed for electric vehicle (EV) charge–discharge scheduling to manage the peak demand in the low-voltage (LV) residential networks. The proposed model uses mixed-integer-programming-based optimization approach to minimize the cost of energy while managing the peak demand and complying with grid constraints. A stochastic model is presented to account for the uncertainties associated with forecast inaccuracies of the day-ahead scheduling. The proposed strategy is assessed by means of simulation studies considering an LV residential neighborhood in Sydney, Australia. The results indicate the effectiveness of the proposed strategy to minimize the cost of electricity for the EV owners while managing the peak demand for the grid operators. Comparison with the state-of-the-art EV scheduling strategies indicates that the proposed strategy can improve the load factor of the local network up to 36%, the peak-to-average ratio up to 27%, and cost reductions up to 56%.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1109/jsyst.2021.3068004

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • As EV penetration increases and combined with other loads, a rebound effect has been identified in literature as a new potential menace to overcharge grid capacity during off-peak periods.

    “however, as the EV penetration is in augmentation, and combined with other loads, a rebound effect has been identified in literature, that can be seen as a new potential menace to overcharge the capacity of the grid during the periods identified as off-peak periods [31,32].”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Rafique, S., Nizami, M. S. H., Irshad, U. B., Hossain, M. J., & Mukhopadhyay, S. C.
Affiliations
  • Macquarie University (AU)
  • University of Technology Sydney (AU)
Venue
IEEE Systems Journal
Published
2022-03
Volume
16
Issue
1
Pages
1520-1528
ISSN
  • 1932-8184 (ISSN-L)
  • 1937-9234
  • 2373-7816
OpenAlex
W3156042304
Cited by
39
References
1
Citations by year
2026: 5 · 2025: 10 · 2024: 10 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 10 · 2021: 1
FWCI
1.77
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • IEEE Systems Journal (publishedVersion)
  • Griffith Research Online (submittedVersion, other-oa)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Electrical and Electronic Engineering › Electric Vehicles and Infrastructure
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Electrical and Electronic Engineering › Smart Grid Energy Management
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Electrical and Electronic Engineering › Electric Power System Optimization
Keywords
electric vehicle charging, peak demand management, mixed integer programming, stochastic scheduling, load factor, peak-to-average power ratio, electricity cost reduction, grid overloading

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review