The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
SIoT: Giving a Social Structure to the Internet of Things
Abstract
The actual development of the Internet of Things (IoT) needs major issues related to things' service discovery and composition to be addressed. This paper proposes a possible approach to solve such issues. We introduce a novel paradigm of "social network of intelligent objects", namely the Social Internet of Things (SIoT), based on the notion of social relationships among objects. Following the definition of a possible social structure among objects, a preliminary architecture for the implementation of SIoT is presented. Through the SIoT paradigm, the capability of humans and devices to discover, select, and use objects with their services in the IoT is augmented. Besides, a level of trustworthiness is enabled to steer the interaction among the billions of objects which will crowd the future IoT.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Social network sites: definition, history, and scholarship
boyd, D. M., & Ellison, N. B. (2007) · Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication · doi:10.1111/j.1083-6101.2007.00393.x · Cited by 16,251
The four elementary forms of sociality: Framework for a unified theory of social relations.
Fiske, A. P. (1992) · Psychological Review · doi:10.1037/0033-295x.99.4.689 · Cited by 2,510
Cited by
Internet of Things (IoT): A vision, architectural elements, and future directions
Gubbi, J., Buyya, R., Marusic, S., & Palaniswami, M. (2013) · Future Generation Computer Systems · doi:10.1016/j.future.2013.01.010 · Cited by 12,293
The Internet of Things—A survey of topics and trends
Whitmore, A., Agarwal, A., & Da Xu, L. (2015) · Information Systems Frontiers · doi:10.1007/s10796-014-9489-2 · Cited by 1,568
Atzori, L., Iera, A., Morabito, G., & Nitti, M. (2012) · Computer Networks · doi:10.1016/j.comnet.2012.07.010 · Cited by 1,238
C2PS: A Digital Twin Architecture Reference Model for the Cloud-Based Cyber-Physical Systems
Alam, K. M., & El Saddik, A. (2017) · IEEE Access · doi:10.1109/access.2017.2657006 · Cited by 741
Trust-based recommendation systems in Internet of Things: a systematic literature review
Mohammadi, V., Rahmani, A. M., Darwesh, A. M., & Sahafi, A. (2019) · Human-centric Computing and Information Sciences · doi:10.1186/s13673-019-0183-8 · Cited by 185
Metadata
- Authors
- Atzori, L., Iera, A., & Morabito, G.
- Venue
- IEEE Communications Letters
- Published
- 2011-11
- Volume
- 15
- Issue
- 11
- Pages
- 1193-1195
- ISSN
- 1089-7798 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2110753472
- Cited by
- 606
- References
- 2
- FWCI
- 28.69
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
