Cited by 1Stability and Control of Uncertain SystemsAge of Information OptimizationAdvanced Control Systems Optimization

Network-Aware Optimal Sampling for Stochastic Control Systems Over Dynamic Networks

Mamduhi, Mohammad H., Maity, Dipankar·2025·IEEE Control Systems Letters

Abstract

Optimal sensor sampling—a key design aspect in sensor and control networks and Internet-of-Things (IoT)—aims for reducing communication load and energy usage. In networked systems where multiple (possibly a large number of) heterogeneous agents use a common communication network to exchange data, network load can be reduced by sampling data only when necessary. Sampling instances are typically optimized such that individual agent’s performance is not substantially decreased, i.e., independent of network conditions. In this letter, we address a network-aware, jointly optimal sampling-control problem for stochastic networked control systems, modeling the network as a dynamical system with memory whose serviceability depends on network input, capacity, delays, and dropouts. We define the network state as an indicator of quality and cost of service. The network broadcasts its current and predicted states to agents, who optimize their sampling and control policies accordingly. Agents submit communication requests through their sampling profiles, enabling the network to update its state, and service as many requests as possible in real time. We derive an analytical solution to the optimal control policy, which is independent of network dynamics. In contrast, the optimal sampling policy is tightly coupled with the network state and dynamics, and is the solution of a mixed-integer nonlinear problem. Our theoretical analysis shows that the integer constraint can be relaxed without affecting the optimality.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1109/lcsys.2025.3581517

Cites

14 of 14 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. Giaccone, Exploiting channel memory for wireless scheduling with limited channel probing: An asymptotic study, 412

Cited by

Still being checked.

Authors
Mamduhi, M. H., & Maity, D.
Affiliations
  • University of Birmingham (GB)
  • University of North Carolina at Charlotte (US)
Venue
IEEE Control Systems Letters
Published
2025
Volume
9
Pages
1808-1813
ISSN
2475-1456 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W4411446188
Cited by
1
References
14
Citations by year
2026: 1
FWCI
0.37
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • IEEE Control Systems Letters (publishedVersion)
  • University of Birmingham Research Portal (University of Birmingham) (submittedVersion)
Funders
  • National Science Foundation (2443349)
  • ARL (DCIST CRA W911NF-17-2-0181)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Control and Systems Engineering › Stability and Control of Uncertain Systems
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Networks and Communications › Age of Information Optimization
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Control and Systems Engineering › Advanced Control Systems Optimization
Keywords
networked control systems, dynamic networks, stochastic control, communication burden reduction, energy efficiency, network state, packet dropping, network latency, mixed-integer nonlinear programming, optimal control policy, Internet of Things

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review