Cited by 0Stochastic Gradient Optimization TechniquesDistributed Control Multi-Agent SystemsOptimization and Variational Analysis

A Delay-Free Adaptive Stepsize for the Incremental Aggregated Gradient Method

Deng, Zhicheng, Wu, Xuyang, Lu, Jie·2025·IEEE Control Systems Letters

Abstract

In most existing asynchronous methods, the stepsize depends on an upper bound on the delays and decreases as this bound increases. However, since the upper bound is usually unknown and large, the resulting stepsizes are not only difficult to determine in practice but also overly conservative, which leads to slow convergence. To solve this issue, we propose an adaptive stepsize strategy for a typical asynchronous optimization method—the Incremental Aggregated Gradient (IAG) method. Unlike existing methods in the literature, our stepsize does not rely on any delay information and is less conservative, which leads to easier stepsize determination and faster convergence. Under standard assumptions, we provide the convergence rate of IAG with the proposed stepsize. Numerical experiments demonstrate the superior performance of our stepsize over alternative stepsize strategies.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1109/lcsys.2025.3650105

Cites

12 of 12 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 9

  1. Feyzmahdavian, 2023, Asynchronous iterations in optimization: New sequence results and sharper algorithmic guarantees, J. Mach. Learn. Res., 24, 1
  2. Bertsekas, 1989, Parallel and Distributed Computation: Numerical Methods
  3. Niu, HOGWILD!: A lock-free approach to parallelizing stochastic gradient descent, 693
  4. Sun, General proximal incremental aggregated gradient algorithms: Better and novel results under general scheme, 32, 1
  5. Li, Parameter server for distributed machine learning, 6, 1
  6. Gu, Fast federated learning in the presence of arbitrary device unavailability, 34, 12052
  7. Wu, Delay-adaptive step-sizes for asynchronous learning, 162, 24093
  8. Roux, A stochastic gradient method with an exponential convergence rate for finite training sets, 25, 1
  9. Mishchenko, A delay-tolerant proximal-gradient algorithm for distributed learning, 80, 3587

Cited by

Still being checked.

Authors
Deng, Z., Wu, X., & Lu, J.
Affiliations
  • ShanghaiTech University (CN)
  • Southern University of Science and Technology (CN)
Venue
IEEE Control Systems Letters
Published
2025
Volume
9
Pages
3095-3100
ISSN
2475-1456 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W7117783371
Cited by
0
References
12
FWCI
0.00
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
IEEE Control Systems Letters (publishedVersion)
Funders
Shenzhen Science and Technology Program (JCYJ20241202125309014)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Stochastic Gradient Optimization Techniques
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Networks and Communications › Distributed Control Multi-Agent Systems
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computational Theory and Mathematics › Optimization and Variational Analysis
Keywords
adaptive step size, asynchronous optimization, distributed optimization, convergence rate, delay bounds

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review