Cited by 0Stability and Control of Uncertain SystemsAdvanced Control Systems OptimizationFormal Methods in Verification

Integral Control Barrier Functions With Input Delay: Prediction, Feasibility, and Robustness

Kiss, Adam K., Das, Ersin, Molnar, Tamas G., Ames, Aaron D.·2026·IEEE Control Systems Letters

Abstract

Click on the DOI link to access this article at the publishers website (may not be free).

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1109/lcsys.2026.3715118

Cites

23 of 23 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Still being checked.

Authors
Kiss, A. K., Das, E., Molnar, T. G., & Ames, A. D.
Affiliations
  • Budapest University of Technology and Economics (HU)
  • Illinois Institute of Technology
  • Wichita State University
  • California Institute of Technology (US)
Venue
IEEE Control Systems Letters
Published
2026
Volume
10
Pages
2077-2082
ISSN
2475-1456 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W7169759983
Cited by
0
References
23
FWCI
0.00
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • IEEE Control Systems Letters (publishedVersion)
  • Holmes Museum Of Anthropology (Wichita State University) (submittedVersion)
Funders
National Research, Development and Innovation Office (NRDI Office) under the National Research Excellence Programme
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Control and Systems Engineering › Stability and Control of Uncertain Systems
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Control and Systems Engineering › Advanced Control Systems Optimization
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computational Theory and Mathematics › Formal Methods in Verification
Keywords
input delay, safety-critical control, feasibility study, robustness, model predictive control, time-delay systems

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review