Cited by 132Physical Unclonable Functions (PUFs) and Hardware SecurityAdvanced Memory and Neural ComputingLow-power high-performance VLSI design

Experimental Characterization of Physical Unclonable Function Based on 1 kb Resistive Random Access Memory Arrays

Liu, Rui, Wu, Huaqiang, Pang, Yachuan, Qian, He, Yu, Shimeng·2015·IEEE Electron Device Letters

Abstract

In this letter, we propose a reliable design of physical unclonable function (PUF) exploiting resistive random access memory (RRAM). Unlike the conventional silicon PUFs based on manufacturing process variation, the randomness of RRAM PUF comes from the stochastic switching mechanism and intrinsic variability of the RRAM devices. RRAM PUF's characteristics, such as uniqueness and reliability, are evaluated on 1 kb HfO2-based 1-transistor-1-resistor (1T1R) arrays. Our experimental results show that the selection of the reference current significantly affects the uniqueness. More dummy cells to generate the reference can improve the uniqueness of RRAM. The reliability of RRAM PUF is determined by the RRAM data retention. A new design is proposed where the sum of the readout currents of multiple RRAM cells is used for generating one response bit, which statistically minimizes the risk of early lifetime failure. The experimental results show that with eight cells per bit, the retention time is more than 50 h at 150 °C or equivalently 10 years at 69 °C. This experimental work demonstrates that RRAM PUF is a viable technology for hardware security primitive with inter-Hamming distance 49.8% and intra-Hamming distance 0%.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1109/led.2015.2496257

Cites

23 of 23 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Liu, R., Wu, H., Pang, Y., Qian, H., & Yu, S.
Affiliations
  • Arizona State University (US)
  • Tsinghua University (CN)
Venue
IEEE Electron Device Letters
Published
2015-12
Volume
36
Issue
12
Pages
1380-1383
ISSN
  • 0741-3106 (ISSN-L)
  • 1558-0563
OpenAlex
W2169325421
Cited by
132
References
23
Citations by year
2026: 8 · 2025: 6 · 2024: 5 · 2023: 12 · 2022: 10 · 2021: 15 · 2020: 14 · 2019: 11 · 2018: 18 · 2017: 17 · 2016: 16
FWCI
27.92
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
IEEE Electron Device Letters (publishedVersion)
Funders
National Science Foundation through the Division of Computing and Communication Foundations (NSF-CCF-1449653)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Hardware and Architecture › Physical Unclonable Functions (PUFs) and Hardware Security
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Electrical and Electronic Engineering › Advanced Memory and Neural Computing
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Electrical and Electronic Engineering › Low-power high-performance VLSI design
Keywords
physical unclonable functions, resistive random access memory, hafnium oxide, stochastic switching, device variability, uniqueness, reliability, data retention, dummy cells, reference current, hardware security, Hamming distance

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review