Cited by 83Robot Manipulation and LearningAdvanced Manufacturing and Logistics OptimizationRobotic Mechanisms and Dynamics

The Next Step in Robot Commissioning: Autonomous Picking and Palletizing

Open access
Krug, Robert, Stoyanov, Todor, Tincani, Vinicio, Andreasson, Henrik, Mosberger, Rafael, Fantoni, Gualtiero, Lilienthal, Achim J.·2016·IEEE Robotics and Automation Letters

Abstract

So far, autonomous order picking (commissioning) systems have not been able to meet the stringent demands regarding speed, safety, and accuracy of real-world warehouse automation, resulting in reliance on human workers. In this letter, we target the next step in autonomous robot commissioning: automatizing the currently manual order picking procedure. To this end, we investigate the use case of autonomous picking and palletizing with a dedicated research platform and discuss lessons learned during testing in simplified warehouse settings. The main theoretical contribution is a novel grasp representation scheme which allows for redundancy in the gripper pose placement. This redundancy is exploited by a local, prioritized kinematic controller which generates reactive manipulator motions on-the-fly. We validated our grasping approach by means of a large set of experiments, which yielded an average grasp acquisition time of 23.5 at a success rate of 94.7. Our system is able to autonomously carry out simple order picking tasks in a human-safe manner, and as such serves as an initial step toward future commercial-scale in-house logistics automation solutions.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1109/lra.2016.2519944

Cites

25 of 25 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

2 of the 27 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Krug, R., Stoyanov, T., Tincani, V., Andreasson, H., Mosberger, R., Fantoni, G., & Lilienthal, A. J.
Affiliations
  • Örebro University (SE)
  • University of Pisa (IT)
Venue
IEEE Robotics and Automation Letters
Published
2016-01
Volume
1
Issue
1
Pages
546-553
ISSN
  • 2377-3766 (ISSN-L)
  • 2377-3774
OpenAlex
W2294174507
Cited by
83
References
27
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 9 · 2024: 6 · 2023: 8 · 2022: 17 · 2021: 9 · 2020: 10 · 2019: 4 · 2018: 12 · 2017: 5 · 2016: 1
FWCI
6.17
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • IEEE Robotics and Automation Letters (publishedVersion)
  • Örebro University Library (Örebro University) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
  • CINECA IRIS Institutial research information system (University of Pisa) (submittedVersion)
Funders
  • EU’s Seventh Framework Programme (ICT-270350)
  • Swedish Knowledge Foundation (20140220)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Control and Systems Engineering › Robot Manipulation and Learning
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Industrial and Manufacturing Engineering › Advanced Manufacturing and Logistics Optimization
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Control and Systems Engineering › Robotic Mechanisms and Dynamics
Keywords
palletizing, warehouse automation, research platform

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review