Cited by 58Soft Robotics and ApplicationsTeleoperation and Haptic SystemsRobotic Mechanisms and Dynamics

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Inverse Kinematics Control Methods for Redundant Snakelike Robot Teleoperation During Minimally Invasive Surgery

Open access
Berthet-Rayne, Pierre, Leibrandt, Konrad, Gras, Gauthier, Fraisse, Philippe, Crosnier, Andre, Yang, Guang-Zhong·2018·IEEE Robotics and Automation Letters

Abstract

The real-time teleoperation or telemanipulation of redundant snakelike robots for minimally invasive surgery in a master-slave configuration is a complex problem. There are many possible mappings between a master's standard 6 degrees of freedom (DOF) and a redundant slave robot, typically with n ≫ 6 DOF. This letter introduces a snakelike robot for ear, nose, and throat surgery. The robot's architecture is comprised of n = 26 joint variables. Six different control methods were investigated. The methods are compared through simulation with a user study. Each participant performed the same task using each of the six different control methods. Based on the metrics selected, the sparse pseudo-L0and our proposed approach performed better in terms of intuitiveness, real-time capabilities, and overall occupied volume.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1109/lra.2018.2812907

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • A teleoperation frequency of 50Hz is sufficient for non-bilateral teleoperation.

    “A teleoperation frequency of 50Hz is common among other non-bilateral systems [7, 50, 39] and in practice demonstrates sufficient performance.”

Citations

Cites

No references could be resolved yet.

Research works printed but not linked: 21

  1. 10.1109/TMECH.2015.2389228 · DOI
  2. 10.1115/DETC2004-57264 · DOI
  3. 10.1109/TMMS.1969.299896 · DOI
  4. 10.1109/LRA.2017.2668465 · DOI
  5. 10.1109/TIT.2006.871582 · DOI · Paper page
  6. chen, 2001, Atomic decomposition by basis pursuit, SIAM Rev, 43, 129, 10.1137/S003614450037906X · DOI
  7. 10.1561/0400000002 · DOI
  8. 10.1109/JSTSP.2007.909363 · DOI
  9. 10.1007/BF01782758 · DOI
  10. schroeder, 2006, The Visualization Toolkit (4th ed )
  11. degani, 0, Highly articulated robotic probe for minimally invasive surgery, Proc IEEE Int Conf Robot Autom, 4167
  12. 10.1109/TBME.2017.2720739 · DOI
  13. 10.1109/ICRA.2015.7139513 · DOI
  14. 10.1061/(ASCE)0893-1321(1999)12:2(65) · DOI
  15. 10.1109/TRO.2015.2418582 · DOI
  16. 10.1007/BF00126069 · DOI
  17. 10.1109/TRO.2015.2489500 · DOI
  18. 10.1109/RBME.2012.2236311 · DOI
  19. 10.1109/LRA.2015.2506259 · DOI
  20. 10.1109/ICRA.2014.6907809 · DOI
  21. 10.1145/1121241.1121249 · DOI

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Berthet-Rayne, P., Leibrandt, K., Gras, G., Fraisse, P., Crosnier, A., & Yang, G.-Z.
Affiliations
  • Imperial College London (GB)
  • Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique (FR)
Venue
IEEE Robotics and Automation Letters
Published
2018-07
Volume
3
Issue
3
Pages
2501-2508
ISSN
  • 2377-3766 (ISSN-L)
  • 2377-3774
OpenAlex
W2790766491
Cited by
58
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 11 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 8 · 2022: 10 · 2021: 9 · 2020: 9 · 2019: 6 · 2018: 3
FWCI
2.69
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • IEEE Robotics and Automation Letters (publishedVersion)
  • HAL (submittedVersion, other-oa)
  • Spiral (Imperial College London) (submittedVersion)
Funders
Hamlyn Centre for Robotic Surgery
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Biomedical Engineering › Soft Robotics and Applications
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Mechanical Engineering › Teleoperation and Haptic Systems
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Control and Systems Engineering › Robotic Mechanisms and Dynamics
Keywords
inverse kinematics, redundant manipulators, teleoperation, minimally invasive surgery, ear, nose and throat surgery, user study, real-time control

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review