The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Inverse Kinematics Control Methods for Redundant Snakelike Robot Teleoperation During Minimally Invasive Surgery
Open accessAbstract
The real-time teleoperation or telemanipulation of redundant snakelike robots for minimally invasive surgery in a master-slave configuration is a complex problem. There are many possible mappings between a master's standard 6 degrees of freedom (DOF) and a redundant slave robot, typically with n ≫ 6 DOF. This letter introduces a snakelike robot for ear, nose, and throat surgery. The robot's architecture is comprised of n = 26 joint variables. Six different control methods were investigated. The methods are compared through simulation with a user study. Each participant performed the same task using each of the six different control methods. Based on the metrics selected, the sparse pseudo-L0and our proposed approach performed better in terms of intuitiveness, real-time capabilities, and overall occupied volume.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
A teleoperation frequency of 50Hz is sufficient for non-bilateral teleoperation.
“A teleoperation frequency of 50Hz is common among other non-bilateral systems [7, 50, 39] and in practice demonstrates sufficient performance.”
From Learning Fine-Grained Bimanual Manipulation with Low-Cost Hardware (2023) · cites this paper as [7]
Citations
Cites
No references could be resolved yet.
Research works printed but not linked: 21
- 10.1109/TMECH.2015.2389228 · DOI
- 10.1115/DETC2004-57264 · DOI
- 10.1109/TMMS.1969.299896 · DOI
- 10.1109/LRA.2017.2668465 · DOI
- 10.1109/TIT.2006.871582 · DOI · Paper page
- chen, 2001, Atomic decomposition by basis pursuit, SIAM Rev, 43, 129, 10.1137/S003614450037906X · DOI
- 10.1561/0400000002 · DOI
- 10.1109/JSTSP.2007.909363 · DOI
- 10.1007/BF01782758 · DOI
- schroeder, 2006, The Visualization Toolkit (4th ed )
- degani, 0, Highly articulated robotic probe for minimally invasive surgery, Proc IEEE Int Conf Robot Autom, 4167
- 10.1109/TBME.2017.2720739 · DOI
- 10.1109/ICRA.2015.7139513 · DOI
- 10.1061/(ASCE)0893-1321(1999)12:2(65) · DOI
- 10.1109/TRO.2015.2418582 · DOI
- 10.1007/BF00126069 · DOI
- 10.1109/TRO.2015.2489500 · DOI
- 10.1109/RBME.2012.2236311 · DOI
- 10.1109/LRA.2015.2506259 · DOI
- 10.1109/ICRA.2014.6907809 · DOI
- 10.1145/1121241.1121249 · DOI
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Learning Fine-Grained Bimanual Manipulation with Low-Cost Hardware
Zhao, T. Z., Kumar, V., Levine, S., & Finn, C. (2023) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2304.13705 · Cited by 673
Learning Fine-Grained Bimanual Manipulation with Low-Cost Hardware
Zhao, T., Kumar, V., Levine, S., & Finn, C. (2023) · Robotics: Science and Systems XIX · doi:10.15607/rss.2023.xix.016 · Cited by 674
Metadata
- Authors
- Berthet-Rayne, P., Leibrandt, K., Gras, G., Fraisse, P., Crosnier, A., & Yang, G.-Z.
- Affiliations
- Imperial College London (GB)
- Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique (FR)
- ORCID
- Venue
- IEEE Robotics and Automation Letters
- Published
- 2018-07
- Volume
- 3
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 2501-2508
- ISSN
- 2377-3766 (ISSN-L)
- 2377-3774
- OpenAlex
- W2790766491
- Cited by
- 58
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2026: 1 · 2025: 11 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 8 · 2022: 10 · 2021: 9 · 2020: 9 · 2019: 6 · 2018: 3
- FWCI
- 2.69
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- Locations
- IEEE Robotics and Automation Letters (publishedVersion)
- HAL (submittedVersion, other-oa)
- Spiral (Imperial College London) (submittedVersion)
- Funders
- Hamlyn Centre for Robotic Surgery
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Engineering › Biomedical Engineering › Soft Robotics and Applications
- Physical Sciences › Engineering › Mechanical Engineering › Teleoperation and Haptic Systems
- Physical Sciences › Engineering › Control and Systems Engineering › Robotic Mechanisms and Dynamics
- Keywords
- inverse kinematics, redundant manipulators, teleoperation, minimally invasive surgery, ear, nose and throat surgery, user study, real-time control
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review