Persistent and Robust Execution of MAPF Schedules in Warehouses
Abstract
Multi-agent path finding (MAPF) is a well-studied problem in artificial intelligence that can be solved quickly in practice when using simplified agent assumptions. However, real-world applications, such as warehouse automation, require physical robots to function over long time horizons without collisions. We present an execution framework that can use existing single-shot MAPF planners and ensures robust execution in the presence of unknown or time-varying higher-order dynamic limits, unforeseen robot slow-downs, and unpredictable obstacle appearances. Our framework also naturally enables the overlap of re-planning and execution for persistent operation and requires little communication between robots and the centralized planner. We demonstrate our approach in warehouse simulations and in a mixed reality experiment using differential drive robots. We believe that our solution closes the gap between recent research in the artificial intelligence community and real-world applications.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Other attempts to exploit multirobot systems for entertainment have relied on some centralized solution to finely control the system.
“In a similar way, other attempts to exploit multirobot systems for entertainment have relied on some centralized solution to finely control the system [132], [133].”
From Swarm Robotics: Past, Present, and Future [Point of View] (2021) · cites this paper as [132]
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Swarm Robotics: Past, Present, and Future [Point of View]
Dorigo, M., Theraulaz, G., & Trianni, V. (2021) · Proceedings of the IEEE · doi:10.1109/jproc.2021.3072740 · Cited by 401 · see citing works
- Authors
- Honig, W., Kiesel, S., Tinka, A., Durham, J. W., & Ayanian, N.
- Affiliations
- Amazon (United States) (US)
- University of Southern California (US)
- Venue
- IEEE Robotics and Automation Letters
- Published
- 2019-04
- Volume
- 4
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 1125-1131
- ISSN
- 2377-3766 (ISSN-L)
- 2377-3774
- OpenAlex
- W2913211223
- Cited by
- 139
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2026: 19 · 2025: 23 · 2024: 28 · 2023: 19 · 2022: 19 · 2021: 20 · 2020: 7 · 2019: 4
- FWCI
- 5.60
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Licence
- Locations
- IEEE Robotics and Automation Letters (publishedVersion)
- Funders
- National Science Foundation (IIS-1724392)
- Association of Research Libraries (W911NF-17-2-0196)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition › Robotic Path Planning Algorithms
- Physical Sciences › Engineering › Ocean Engineering › Evacuation and Crowd Dynamics
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Reinforcement Learning in Robotics
- Keywords
- multi-agent path finding, warehouse automation, replanning, dynamic obstacles, collision avoidance, central planning, differential drive robot, long time horizons
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review