Cited by 139Robotic Path Planning AlgorithmsEvacuation and Crowd DynamicsReinforcement Learning in Robotics

Persistent and Robust Execution of MAPF Schedules in Warehouses

Honig, Wolfgang, Kiesel, Scott, Tinka, Andrew, Durham, Joseph W., Ayanian, Nora·2019·IEEE Robotics and Automation Letters

Abstract

Multi-agent path finding (MAPF) is a well-studied problem in artificial intelligence that can be solved quickly in practice when using simplified agent assumptions. However, real-world applications, such as warehouse automation, require physical robots to function over long time horizons without collisions. We present an execution framework that can use existing single-shot MAPF planners and ensures robust execution in the presence of unknown or time-varying higher-order dynamic limits, unforeseen robot slow-downs, and unpredictable obstacle appearances. Our framework also naturally enables the overlap of re-planning and execution for persistent operation and requires little communication between robots and the centralized planner. We demonstrate our approach in warehouse simulations and in a mixed reality experiment using differential drive robots. We believe that our solution closes the gap between recent research in the artificial intelligence community and real-world applications.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1109/lra.2019.2894217

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Other attempts to exploit multirobot systems for entertainment have relied on some centralized solution to finely control the system.

    “In a similar way, other attempts to exploit multirobot systems for entertainment have relied on some centralized solution to finely control the system [132], [133].”

    From Swarm Robotics: Past, Present, and Future [Point of View] (2021) · cites this paper as [132]

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Honig, W., Kiesel, S., Tinka, A., Durham, J. W., & Ayanian, N.
Affiliations
  • Amazon (United States) (US)
  • University of Southern California (US)
Venue
IEEE Robotics and Automation Letters
Published
2019-04
Volume
4
Issue
2
Pages
1125-1131
ISSN
  • 2377-3766 (ISSN-L)
  • 2377-3774
OpenAlex
W2913211223
Cited by
139
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 19 · 2025: 23 · 2024: 28 · 2023: 19 · 2022: 19 · 2021: 20 · 2020: 7 · 2019: 4
FWCI
5.60
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
IEEE Robotics and Automation Letters (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • National Science Foundation (IIS-1724392)
  • Association of Research Libraries (W911NF-17-2-0196)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition › Robotic Path Planning Algorithms
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Ocean Engineering › Evacuation and Crowd Dynamics
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Reinforcement Learning in Robotics
Keywords
multi-agent path finding, warehouse automation, replanning, dynamic obstacles, collision avoidance, central planning, differential drive robot, long time horizons

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review