The DOI matches its Crossref record; 53 of the 53 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Graduated Non-Convexity for Robust Spatial Perception: From Non-Minimal Solvers to Global Outlier Rejection
Open accessAbstract
Semidefinite Programming (SDP) and Sums-of-Squares (SOS) relaxations have led to certifiably optimal non-minimal solvers for several robotics and computer vision problems. However, most non-minimal solvers rely on least squares formulations, and, as a result, are brittle against outliers. While a standard approach to regain robustness against outliers is to use robust cost functions, the latter typically introduce other non-convexities, preventing the use of existing non-minimal solvers. In this letter, we enable the simultaneous use of non-minimal solvers and robust estimation by providing a general-purpose approach for robust global estimation, which can be applied to any problem where a nonminimal solver is available for the outlier-free case. To this end, we leverage the Black-Rangarajan duality between robust estimation and outlier processes (which has been traditionally applied to early vision problems), and show that graduated non-convexity (GNC) can be used in conjunction with non-minimal solvers to compute robust solutions, without requiring an initial guess. we demonstrate the resulting robust non-minimal solvers in applications, including point cloud and mesh registration, pose graph optimization, and image-based object pose estimation (also called shape alignment). Our solvers are robust to 70-80% of outliers, outperform RANSAC, are more accurate than specialized local solvers, and faster than specialized global solvers. We also propose thefirst certifiably optimal non-minimal solver for shape alignment using SOS relaxation.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Fischler, M. A., & Bolles, R. C. (1981) · Communications of the ACM · doi:10.1145/358669.358692 · Cited by 25,893
Closed-form solution of absolute orientation using unit quaternions
Horn, B. K. P. (1987) · Journal of the Optical Society of America A · doi:10.1364/josaa.4.000629 · Cited by 4,116
Least-Squares Fitting of Two 3-D Point Sets
Arun, K. S., Huang, T. S., & Blostein, S. D. (1987) · IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence · doi:10.1109/tpami.1987.4767965 · Cited by 3,952
Past, Present, and Future of Simultaneous Localization and Mapping: Toward the Robust-Perception Age
Cadena, C., Carlone, L., Carrillo, H., Latif, Y., Scaramuzza, D., Neira, J., Reid, I., & Leonard, J. J. (2016) · IEEE Transactions on Robotics · doi:10.1109/tro.2016.2624754 · Cited by 3,596
Self-citationA volumetric method for building complex models from range images
Curless, B., & Levoy, M. (1996) · Proceedings of the 23rd annual conference on Computer graphics and interactive techniques · doi:10.1145/237170.237269 · Cited by 3,124
Past, present, and future of simultaneous localization and mapping: Toward the robust-perception age
Cadena, C., Carlone, L., Carrillo, H., Latif, Y., Scaramuzza, D., Neira, J., Reid, I. D., & Leonard, J. J. (2016) · Zurich Open Repository and Archive (University of Zurich) · doi:10.5167/uzh-138892 · Cited by 3,048
Self-citationMultiple View Geometry in Computer Vision (2nd ed)
Hartley, R. I., & Zisserman, A. (2003) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · Cited by 2,761
Global Optimization with Polynomials and the Problem of Moments
Lasserre, J. B. (2001) · SIAM Journal on Optimization · doi:10.1137/s1052623400366802 · Cited by 2,474
Blake, A., & Zisserman, A. (1987) · The MIT Press eBooks · doi:10.7551/mitpress/7132.001.0001 · Cited by 2,105
G2o: A general framework for graph optimization
Kummerle, R., Grisetti, G., Strasdat, H., Konolige, K., & Burgard, W. (2011) · 2011 IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation · doi:10.1109/icra.2011.5979949 · Cited by 1,982
Cited by
TEASER: Fast and Certifiable Point Cloud Registration
Yang, H., Shi, J., & Carlone, L. (2021) · IEEE Transactions on Robotics · doi:10.1109/tro.2020.3033695 · Cited by 895
Self-citationTsintotas, K. A., Bampis, L., & Gasteratos, A. (2022) · IEEE Transactions on Intelligent Transportation Systems · doi:10.1109/tits.2022.3175656 · Cited by 175
Metadata
- Authors
- Yang, H., Antonante, P., Tzoumas, V., & Carlone, L.
- Venue
- IEEE Robotics and Automation Letters
- Published
- 2020-04
- Volume
- 5
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 1127-1134
- ISSN
- 2377-3766 (ISSN-L)
- 2377-3774
- OpenAlex
- W2973258311
- Cited by
- 325
- References
- 53
- FWCI
- 32.18
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Graduated Non-Convexity for Robust Spatial Perception: From Non-Minimal Solvers to Global Outlier Rejection. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1109/lra.2020.2965893
- The paper
- Yang, H., Antonante, P., Tzoumas, V., & Carlone, L. (2020). Graduated Non-Convexity for Robust Spatial Perception: From Non-Minimal Solvers to Global Outlier Rejection. IEEE Robotics and Automation Letters. https://doi.org/10.1109/lra.2020.2965893
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.