Cited by 31Image Enhancement TechniquesAdvanced Image Processing TechniquesImage and Video Quality Assessment

Adaptive Debanding Filter

Open access
Tu, Zhengzhong, Lin, Jessie, Wang, Yilin, Adsumilli, Balu, Bovik, Alan C.·2020·IEEE Signal Processing Letters

Abstract

Banding artifacts, which manifest as staircase-like color bands on pictures or video frames, is a common distortion caused by compression of low-textured smooth regions. These false contours can be very noticeable even on high-quality videos, especially when displayed on high-definition screens. Yet, relatively little attention has been applied to this problem. Here we consider banding artifact removal as a visual enhancement problem, and accordingly, we solve it by applying a form of content-adaptive smoothing filtering followed by dithered quantization, as a post-processing module. The proposed debanding filter is able to adaptively smooth banded regions while preserving image edges and details, yielding perceptually enhanced gradient rendering with limited bit-depths. Experimental results show that our proposed debanding filter outperforms state-of-the-art false contour removing algorithms both visually and quantitatively.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1109/lsp.2020.3024985

Cites

32 of 32 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

1 of the 33 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. [23][23] Z. Tu, J. Lin, Y. Wang, B. Adsumilli, and A. C. Bovik, 'Bband index: a noreference banding artifact predictor,' in Proc. IEEE Int. Conf. Acoust., Speech, Signal Process. (ICASSP) . IEEE, 2020, pp. 2712-2716. -

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Tu, Z., Lin, J., Wang, Y., Adsumilli, B., & Bovik, A. C.
Affiliations
  • The University of Texas at Austin (US)
  • Google (United States) (US)
Venue
IEEE Signal Processing Letters
Published
2020
Volume
27
Pages
1715-1719
ISSN
  • 1070-9908 (ISSN-L)
  • 1558-2361
OpenAlex
W3088230179
Cited by
31
References
33
Citations by year
2025: 9 · 2024: 5 · 2023: 5 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 6 · 2020: 3
FWCI
1.65
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • IEEE Signal Processing Letters (publishedVersion)
  • arXiv (Cornell University) (submittedVersion)
  • arXiv (Cornell University)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition › Image Enhancement Techniques
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition › Advanced Image Processing Techniques
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition › Image and Video Quality Assessment
Keywords
false contouring, dithered quantization, video post-processing, edge preservation

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review