The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Sticky Policies: An Approach for Managing Privacy across Multiple Parties
Abstract
Machine-readable policies can stick to data to define allowed usage and obligations as it travels across multiple parties, enabling users to improve control over their personal information. The EnCoRe project has developed such a technical solution for privacy management that is suitable for use in a broad range of domains.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Shamir, A. (1979) · Communications of the ACM · doi:10.1145/359168.359176 · Cited by 13,756
Platform for Enterprise Privacy Practices: Privacy-Enabled Management of Customer Data
Karjoth, G., Schunter, M., & Waidner, M. (2003) · Lecture Notes in Computer Science · doi:10.1007/3-540-36467-6_6 · Cited by 221
Cited by
Dynamic consent: a patient interface for twenty-first century research networks
Kaye, J., Whitley, E. A., Lund, D., Morrison, M., Teare, H., & Melham, K. (2015) · European Journal of Human Genetics · doi:10.1038/ejhg.2014.71 · Cited by 780
Forgetting personal data and revoking consent under the GDPR: Challenges and proposed solutions
Politou, E., Alepis, E., & Patsakis, C. (2018) · Journal of Cybersecurity · doi:10.1093/cybsec/tyy001 · Cited by 313
Data flow management and compliance in cloud computing
Singh, J., Powles, J., Pasquier, T., & Bacon, J. (2015) · IEEE Cloud Computing · doi:10.1109/mcc.2015.69 · Cited by 48
Sicari, S., Rizzardi, A., Dini, G., Perazzo, P., La Manna, M., & Coen-Porisini, A. (2021) · International Journal of Information Security · doi:10.1007/s10207-020-00526-3 · Cited by 21
Big Data and Analytics in the Age of the GDPR
Bonatti, P. A., & Kirrane, S. (2019) · 2019 IEEE International Congress on Big Data (BigDataCongress) · doi:10.1109/bigdatacongress.2019.00015 · Cited by 16
Metadata
- Authors
- Pearson, S., & Casassa-Mont, M.
- Venue
- Computer
- Published
- 2011-09
- Volume
- 44
- Issue
- 9
- Pages
- 60-68
- ISSN
- 0018-9162 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2122442215
- Cited by
- 161
- References
- 2
- FWCI
- 23.58
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
