Cited by 230Privacy, Security, and Data ProtectionSpeech and dialogue systemsSecurity and Verification in Computing

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 4 of the 4 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

“Alexa, Can I Trust You?”

Open access

Abstract

Several recent incidents highlight significant security and privacy risks associated with intelligent virtual assistants (IVAs). Better diagnostic testing of IVA ecosystems can reveal such vulnerabilities and lead to more trustworthy systems.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1109/mc.2017.3571053

Cites

4 of 4 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Show all 4 references

Research works printed but not linked: 9

  1. anderson, 2017, How Burger King Revealed the Hackability of Voice Assistants
  2. opam, 2017, Google's Super Bowl Ad Accidentally Set off a Lot of Google Homes
  3. york, 2016, Dyn Statement on 10/21/2016 DDoS Attack
  4. owens, 2016, Stranger Hacks Family's Baby Monitor and Talks to Child at Night, GlobeCOM San Francisco
  5. rodionova, 2017, Burger King Ad Backfires after Asking Google What's in a Whopper and Is told'Cyanide, The Independent
  6. wood, 2017, Devices Sprout Ears: What Do Alexa and Siri Mean for Privacy?, The Christian Science Monitor
  7. 2017, Exploring the Amazon Echo Dot Part 1 Intercepting Firmware Updates
  8. liptak, 2017, Amazon's Alexa Started Ordering People Dollhouses after Hearing Its Name on TV
  9. 2016, Gartner Says Worldwide Spending on VPA-Enabled Wireless Speakers Will Top $2 Billion by 2020

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Items 201–228 of 228

Metadata

Authors
Chung, H., Iorga, M., Voas, J., & Lee, S.
Affiliations
  • National Institute of Standards and Technology (US)
  • Korea University (KR)
Venue
Computer
Published
2017
Volume
50
Issue
9
Pages
100-104
ISSN
  • 0018-9162 (ISSN-L)
  • 1558-0814
OpenAlex
W2759491482
Cited by
230
References
4
Citations by year
2026: 4 · 2025: 15 · 2024: 12 · 2023: 27 · 2022: 38 · 2021: 49 · 2020: 42 · 2019: 28 · 2018: 14 · 2017: 1
FWCI
59.54
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Computer (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Privacy, Security, and Data Protection
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Speech and dialogue systems
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Hardware and Architecture › Security and Verification in Computing
Keywords
virtual assistants, security vulnerabilities, privacy risks, trustworthiness, diagnostic testing, voice assistants

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review