Cited by 55Digitalization, Law, and RegulationEthics and Social Impacts of AIInternet of Things and AI

Accountability in the IoT: Systems, Law, and Ways Forward

Singh, Jatinder, Millard, Christopher, Reed, Chris, Cobbe, Jennifer, Crowcroft, Jon·2018·Computer

Abstract

The physical, ubiquitous, and autonomous nature of the emerging Internet of Things (IoT) raises various accountability challenges relating to safety and security, privacy and surveillance, and governance and responsibility. The authors consider the IoT’s emerging systems-of-systems nature, providing the broad legal context for addressing these concerns and highlighting directions and opportunities for improving levels of accountability in the applications, systems, and services that will increasingly pervade society.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1109/mc.2018.3011052

Cites

16 of 16 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Information about the workflow of model construction and deployment facilitates auditing of the learning algorithm, hyperparameters, predictor variables, and coefficients.

    “Information about the workflow of model construc- 20 GDPR, Art 22. tion and deployment itself facilitates auditing of, for example, the learning algorithm (or algorithms in ensemble models) used, hyperparameters, predictor variables, and coefficients (variable weights) [40].”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Singh, J., Millard, C., Reed, C., Cobbe, J., & Crowcroft, J.
Affiliations
  • University of Cambridge (GB)
  • Queen Mary University of London (GB)
Venue
Computer
Published
2018-07
Volume
51
Issue
7
Pages
54-65
ISSN
  • 0018-9162 (ISSN-L)
  • 1558-0814
OpenAlex
W2887344017
Cited by
55
References
16
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 4 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 4 · 2022: 7 · 2021: 14 · 2020: 11 · 2019: 8 · 2018: 1 · 2012: 1
FWCI
78.44
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Computer (publishedVersion)
  • Cambridge University Engineering Department Publications Database (submittedVersion)
Funders
  • Microsoft
  • Engineering and Physical Sciences Research Council (EP/P024394/1)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Law › Digitalization, Law, and Regulation
  • Social Sciences › Safety Research › Ethics and Social Impacts of AI
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Information Systems › Internet of Things and AI
Keywords
Internet of Things, accountability, Internet of Things security, IoT privacy, surveillance, governance, responsibility, systems of systems, legal framework, safety

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review