The DOI matches its Crossref record; 7 of the 7 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Generative Artificial Intelligence and the Education Sector
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“However, it has also been acknowledged that AImay be holding promise in supporting students who speak English as a second language, those with learning difficulties and students who are neurodiverse (Ahmad et al., 2023), consistent with comments from students arguing that these applications have the potential to 'level the playing field'.”
From The rapid rise of generative AI and its implications for academic integrity: Students’ perceptions and use of chatbots for assistance with assessments (2024) · cites this paper as Ahmad et al., 2023
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Dwivedi, Y. K., Kshetri, N., Hughes, L., Slade, E. L., Jeyaraj, A., Kar, A. K., Baabdullah, A. M., Koohang, A., Raghavan, V., Ahuja, M., et al. (2023) · International Journal of Information Management · doi:10.1016/j.ijinfomgt.2023.102642 · Cited by 4,584
Self-citationBaidoo-Anu, D., & Owusu Ansah, L. (2023) · doi:10.2139/ssrn.4337484 · Cited by 3,004
ChatGPT: five priorities for research
van Dis, E. A. M., Bollen, J., Zuidema, W., van Rooij, R., & Bockting, C. L. (2023) · Nature · doi:10.1038/d41586-023-00288-7 · Cited by 1,842
ChatGPT User Experience: Implications for Education
Zhai, X. (2023) · doi:10.2139/ssrn.4312418 · Cited by 935
ChatGPT listed as author on research papers: many scientists disapprove
Stokel-Walker, C. (2023) · Nature · doi:10.1038/d41586-023-00107-z · Cited by 868
The Robots Are Coming: Exploring the Implications of OpenAI Codex on Introductory Programming
Finnie-Ansley, J., Denny, P., Becker, B. A., Luxton-Reilly, A., & Prather, J. (2022) · Proceedings of the 24th Australasian Computing Education Conference · doi:10.1145/3511861.3511863 · Cited by 463
ChatGPT: The End of Online Exam Integrity?
Susnjak, T. (2022) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2212.09292 · Cited by 370
Research works printed but not linked: 16
- bown, 2023, Text-to-audio generation is here One of the next big AI disruptions could be in the music industry
- vincent, 2022, OpenAI’s new chatbot can explain code and write sitcom scripts but is still easily tricked
- villasenor, 2023, How CHATGPT can improve education not threaten it
- 2023, Ask Laura Why are school districts banning ChatGPT and what do parents and students need to know? A growing number of school districts across the country are banning ChatGPT from school devices
- wolfson, 0, This is not a bicycle Human creativity and generative AI
- 10.1109/MC.2022.3192720 · DOI · Paper page
- roy, 2022, Why artificial intelligence will never replace teachers
- smulian, 0, Using AI to help emergent bilinguals learn English
- syme, 2023, A $162 500 per year Swiss boarding school — Possibly the world’s most expensive — Says it’s embracing AI tech like ChatGPT to help students learn
- sands, 2023, As school districts across the country debate banning ChatGPT Charlotte-Mecklenburg schools has already blocked the artificial intelligence tool from students’ devices
- kirchner, 2023, New AI classifier for indicating AI-written text, Open
- svrluga, 2023, Higher education Was that Essay written by AI? A student made an app that might tell you
- kim, 2019, Automated essay scoring using a deep learning model, J Educ Technol Develop Exchange, 2, 1
- 10.1007/s10994-021-05983-y · DOI
- 10.1386/ajr_00101_7 · DOI
- 0, ChatGPT and cheating 5 ways to change how students are graded
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Gruenhagen, J. H., Sinclair, P. M., Carroll, J.-A., Baker, P. R. A., Wilson, A., & Demant, D. (2024) · Computers and Education: Artificial Intelligence · doi:10.1016/j.caeai.2024.100273 · Cited by 339
ChatGPT in education: Methods, potentials, and limitations
Memarian, B., & Doleck, T. (2023) · Computers in Human Behavior: Artificial Humans · doi:10.1016/j.chbah.2023.100022 · Cited by 266
Generative AI in education and research: A systematic mapping review
Yusuf, A., Pervin, N., Román‐González, M., & Noor, N. M. (2024) · Review of Education · doi:10.1002/rev3.3489 · Cited by 182
Han, A., Zhou, X., Cai, Z., Han, S., Ko, R., Corrigan, S., & Peppler, K. A. (2024) · Proceedings of the CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems · doi:10.1145/3613904.3642438 · Cited by 114
ChatGPT in Education: A Systematic Review on Opportunities, Challenges, and Future Directions
Munaye, Y. Y., Admass, W., Belayneh, Y., Molla, A., & Asmare, M. (2025) · Algorithms · doi:10.3390/a18060352 · Cited by 73
“Research should look at teacher AI interaction models and assess their impact on classroom engagement and curriculum design [14].”
Influential
Metadata
- Authors
- Ahmad, N., Murugesan, S., & Kshetri, N.
- Affiliations
- American University of Sharjah, Sharjah, United Arab Emirates
- BRITE Professional Services, Sydney, Australia
- Bryan School of Business and Economics, University of North Carolina at Greensboro, Greensboro, USA
- Venue
- Computer
- Published
- 2023-06
- Volume
- 56
- Issue
- 6
- Pages
- 72-76
- ISSN
- 0018-9162
- 1558-0814
- Cited by
- 95
- References
- 7
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
