Personalized Human Activity Recognition: Real-Time On-Device Training and Inference
Abstract
The conventional Human Activity Recognition (HAR) systems use smartwatches, smartphones, and other wearable devices to autonomously derive consumer physical activities. However, implementing real-time HAR in resource-constrained applications is challenging. Computational offloading approaches must address network reliance, latency, and data privacy, which affect system performance. The present study proposes a low-cost, wearable HAR device that collects and transmits the Inertial Measurement Unit (IMU) telemetry signals to smartphones, enabling real-time on-device activity detection. Human actions are subjective and affected by physiological, environmental, and behavioural factors, complicating HAR systems' performance in personalized contexts. Generalized methods for existing systems reduce performance for new consumers or due to alterations in consumer locomotive signatures. Thus, our second goal is to enable the on-device personalization of wearable HAR models with minimum customer calibration. The HAR device, which is in the form of a smart-band, transfers data to and fro smartphones through Bluetooth Low Energy (BLE). A lightweight 1D convolutional neural network (CNN) is built and, using transfer learning, the network model is fine-tuned from real-time sensed data. On-device HAR inferences ensure real-time processing on smartphones without computational offloading. Smartphone-based on-device training for fine-tuning the model allows the HAR system to get customized without compromising privacy or computational costs. The experimental results show that the personalized classification achieves on average 98% accuracy when assessed using four benchmark datasets.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Personalized HAR methods suffer from added complexity and computational overhead due to the two-stage training pipeline.
“While effective, these methods suffer from two major limitations: (1) collecting data from each new user increases deployment costs, and (2) the two-stage training pipeline adds complexity and computational overhead.”
From Towards User-Generalizable Wearable-Sensor-Based Human Activity Recognition: A Multi-Task Contrastive Learning Approach (2025) · cites this paper as [13]
Personalized HAR methods suffer from increased deployment costs because collecting data from each new user is required.
“While effective, these methods suffer from two major limitations: (1) collecting data from each new user increases deployment costs, and (2) the two-stage training pipeline adds complexity and computational overhead.”
From Towards User-Generalizable Wearable-Sensor-Based Human Activity Recognition: A Multi-Task Contrastive Learning Approach (2025) · cites this paper as [13]
Personalized HAR frameworks typically adopt a two-stage approach: pre-training on a general dataset followed by fine-tuning on data from the target user.
“Prior works have explored personalized HAR frameworks [11,12,13,14,15,16], typically adopting a two-stage approach: pre-training on a general dataset followed by fine-tuning on data from the target user.”
From Towards User-Generalizable Wearable-Sensor-Based Human Activity Recognition: A Multi-Task Contrastive Learning Approach (2025) · cites this paper as [13]
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 12 · Cited by 24
- Authors
- Saha, B., Samanta, R., Roy, R. B., Chakraborty, C., & Ghosh, S. K.
- Affiliations
- Indian Institute of Technology Kharagpur (IN)
- Birla Institute of Technology, Mesra (IN)
- Venue
- IEEE Consumer Electronics Magazine
- Published
- 2025-03
- Volume
- 14
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 84-89
- ISSN
- 2162-2248 (ISSN-L)
- 2162-2256
- OpenAlex
- W4396753451
- Cited by
- 24
- References
- 12
- Citations by year
- 2026: 6 · 2025: 16 · 2024: 2
- FWCI
- 3.38
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Licence
- Locations
- IEEE Consumer Electronics Magazine (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition › Context-Aware Activity Recognition Systems
- Physical Sciences › Engineering › Biomedical Engineering › Gait Recognition and Analysis
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Human-Computer Interaction › Hand Gesture Recognition Systems
- Keywords
- human activity recognition, on-device learning, on-device inference, wearable devices, smart band, inertial measurement unit, Bluetooth Low Energy, transfer learning, fine-tuning, 1D convolutional neural network, data privacy, resource-constrained devices
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review