Cited by 24Context-Aware Activity Recognition SystemsGait Recognition and AnalysisHand Gesture Recognition Systems

Personalized Human Activity Recognition: Real-Time On-Device Training and Inference

Saha, Bidyut, Samanta, Riya, Roy, Ram Babu, Chakraborty, Chinmay, Ghosh, Soumya K.·2025·IEEE Consumer Electronics Magazine

Abstract

The conventional Human Activity Recognition (HAR) systems use smartwatches, smartphones, and other wearable devices to autonomously derive consumer physical activities. However, implementing real-time HAR in resource-constrained applications is challenging. Computational offloading approaches must address network reliance, latency, and data privacy, which affect system performance. The present study proposes a low-cost, wearable HAR device that collects and transmits the Inertial Measurement Unit (IMU) telemetry signals to smartphones, enabling real-time on-device activity detection. Human actions are subjective and affected by physiological, environmental, and behavioural factors, complicating HAR systems' performance in personalized contexts. Generalized methods for existing systems reduce performance for new consumers or due to alterations in consumer locomotive signatures. Thus, our second goal is to enable the on-device personalization of wearable HAR models with minimum customer calibration. The HAR device, which is in the form of a smart-band, transfers data to and fro smartphones through Bluetooth Low Energy (BLE). A lightweight 1D convolutional neural network (CNN) is built and, using transfer learning, the network model is fine-tuned from real-time sensed data. On-device HAR inferences ensure real-time processing on smartphones without computational offloading. Smartphone-based on-device training for fine-tuning the model allows the HAR system to get customized without compromising privacy or computational costs. The experimental results show that the personalized classification achieves on average 98% accuracy when assessed using four benchmark datasets.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1109/mce.2024.3398294

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 12 · Cited by 24

Authors
Saha, B., Samanta, R., Roy, R. B., Chakraborty, C., & Ghosh, S. K.
Affiliations
  • Indian Institute of Technology Kharagpur (IN)
  • Birla Institute of Technology, Mesra (IN)
Venue
IEEE Consumer Electronics Magazine
Published
2025-03
Volume
14
Issue
2
Pages
84-89
ISSN
  • 2162-2248 (ISSN-L)
  • 2162-2256
OpenAlex
W4396753451
Cited by
24
References
12
Citations by year
2026: 6 · 2025: 16 · 2024: 2
FWCI
3.38
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
IEEE Consumer Electronics Magazine (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition › Context-Aware Activity Recognition Systems
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Biomedical Engineering › Gait Recognition and Analysis
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Human-Computer Interaction › Hand Gesture Recognition Systems
Keywords
human activity recognition, on-device learning, on-device inference, wearable devices, smart band, inertial measurement unit, Bluetooth Low Energy, transfer learning, fine-tuning, 1D convolutional neural network, data privacy, resource-constrained devices

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review