Cited by 42Smart Grid Security and ResiliencePower Systems and TechnologiesTechnology and Security Systems

On smart grid cybersecurity standardization: issues of designing with nistir 7628

Chan, A. C., Jianying Zhou·2013·IEEE Communications Magazine

Abstract

Cybersecurity is an important but usually not adequately addressed area in the smart grid. Its standardization is also relatively immature. The NISTIR 7628 seems to be a comprehensive document for security designers/practitioners in smart grid research and practice. However, the NISTIR 7628 security framework might still be insufficient to specify the requirements of a secure smart grid system. More specifically, the EV charging infrastructure is used to study the effectiveness of the NISTIR 7628 framework in specifying security criteria, and the resulting security assurance. Two weaknesses, one in addressing node or device authentication and the other in location privacy of EV owners, are found for a system satisfying all the security requirements stipulated by the NISTIR 7628, thus illustrating the subtlety of applying the NISTIR 7628.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1109/mcom.2013.6400439

Cites

5 of 5 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • KDD99 is widely used dataset since 1999 for the evaluation of IDSs.

    “KDD99 [68] is widely used dataset since 1999 for the evaluation of IDSs.”

    From Architecture and security of SCADA systems: A review (2021) · cites this paper as [68]

  • Datasets KDD99, NSS-KDD, and DARPA are outdated and not synchronised with modern SCADA architecture.

    “Datasets KDD99 [68], NSS-KDD [69], DARPA [70] are outdated and not synchronised with modern SCADA architecture.”

    From Architecture and security of SCADA systems: A review (2021) · cites this paper as [68]

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Chan, A. C., & Zhou, J.
Affiliations
Institute for Infocomm Research (SG)
Venue
IEEE Communications Magazine
Published
2013-01
Volume
51
Issue
1
Pages
58-65
ISSN
0163-6804 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2026219793
Cited by
42
References
5
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 1 · 2024: 3 · 2022: 4 · 2021: 5 · 2020: 2 · 2019: 3 · 2018: 4 · 2017: 3 · 2016: 4 · 2015: 5 · 2014: 5 · 2013: 2
FWCI
7.01
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
IEEE Communications Magazine (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • Energy Market Authority of Singapore
  • National Institute of Standards and Technology
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Control and Systems Engineering › Smart Grid Security and Resilience
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Electrical and Electronic Engineering › Power Systems and Technologies
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Information Systems › Technology and Security Systems
Keywords
smart grid cybersecurity, security standardization, electric vehicle charging infrastructure, device authentication, location privacy, security assurance, security requirements

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review