The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Toward better horizontal integration among IoT services
Abstract
Several divergent application protocols have been proposed for Internet of Things (IoT) solutions including CoAP, REST, XMPP, AMQP, MQTT, DDS, and others. Each protocol focuses on a specific aspect of IoT communications. The lack of a protocol that can handle the vertical market requirements of IoT applications including machine-to-machine, machine-to-server, and server-to-server communications has resulted in a fragmented market between many protocols. In turn, this fragmentation is a main hindrance in the development of new services that require the integration of multiple IoT services to unlock new capabilities and provide horizontal integration among services. In this work, after articulating the major shortcomings of the current IoT protocols, we outline a rule-based intelligent gateway that bridges the gap between existing IoT protocols to enable the efficient integration of horizontal IoT services. While this intelligent gateway enhances the gloomy picture of protocol fragmentation in the context of IoT, it does not address the root cause of this fragmentation, which lies in the inability of the current protocols to offer a wide range of QoS guarantees. To offer a solution that stems the root cause of this protocol fragmentation issue, we propose a generic IoT protocol that is flexible enough to address the IoT vertical market requirements. In this regard, we enhance the baseline MQTT protocol by allowing it to support rich QoS features by exploiting a mix of IP multicasting, intelligent broker queuing management, and traffic analytics techniques. Our initial evaluation of the lightweight enhanced MQTT protocol reveals significant improvement over the baseline protocol in terms of the delay performance.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Internet of Things: A Survey on Enabling Technologies, Protocols, and Applications
Al-Fuqaha, A., Guizani, M., Mohammadi, M., Aledhari, M., & Ayyash, M. (2015) · IEEE Communications Surveys & Tutorials · doi:10.1109/comst.2015.2444095 · Cited by 8,630
Self-citationIndustrial Internet of Things: Challenges, Opportunities, and Directions
Sisinni, E., Saifullah, A., Han, S., Jennehag, U., & Gidlund, M. (2018) · IEEE Transactions on Industrial Informatics · doi:10.1109/tii.2018.2852491 · Cited by 2,380
Deep Learning for IoT Big Data and Streaming Analytics: A Survey
Mohammadi, M., Al-Fuqaha, A., Sorour, S., & Guizani, M. (2018) · IEEE Communications Surveys & Tutorials · doi:10.1109/comst.2018.2844341 · Cited by 1,471
Self-citationInternet of Things is a revolutionary approach for future technology enhancement: a review
Kumar, S., Tiwari, P., & Zymbler, M. (2019) · Journal of Big Data · doi:10.1186/s40537-019-0268-2 · Cited by 1,253
Internet of Things (IoT): A review of enabling technologies, challenges, and open research issues
Čolaković, A., & Hadžialić, M. (2018) · Computer Networks · doi:10.1016/j.comnet.2018.07.017 · Cited by 825
Metadata
- Authors
- Al-Fuqaha, A., Khreishah, A., Guizani, M., Rayes, A., & Mohammadi, M.
- Venue
- IEEE Communications Magazine
- Published
- 2015-09
- Volume
- 53
- Issue
- 9
- Pages
- 72-79
- ISSN
- 0163-6804 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2116769344
- Cited by
- 198
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 13.47
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Toward better horizontal integration among IoT services. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1109/mcom.2015.7263375
- The paper
- Al-Fuqaha, A., Khreishah, A., Guizani, M., Rayes, A., & Mohammadi, M. (2015). Toward better horizontal integration among IoT services. IEEE Communications Magazine. https://doi.org/10.1109/mcom.2015.7263375
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.