The DOI matches its Crossref record; 4 of the 4 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Architectural Imperatives for Fog Computing: Use Cases, Requirements, and Architectural Techniques for Fog-Enabled IoT Networks
Abstract
Fog computing is an architecture that extends the traditionally centralized functions of cloud computing to the edge and into close proximity to the things in an Internet of Things network. Fog computing brings many advantages, including enhanced performance, better efficiency, network bandwidth savings, improved security, and resiliency. This article discusses some of the more important architectural requirements for critical Internet of Things networks in the context of exemplary use cases, and how fog computing techniques can help fulfill them.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Fog computing and its role in the internet of things
Bonomi, F., Milito, R., Zhu, J., & Addepalli, S. (2012) · Proceedings of the first edition of the MCC workshop on Mobile cloud computing · doi:10.1145/2342509.2342513 · Cited by 6,244
The case for vm-based cloudlets in mobile computing
Satyanarayanan, M., Bahl, P., Caceres, R., & Davies, N. (2009) · IEEE Pervasive Computing · doi:10.1109/mprv.2009.82 · Cited by 3,660
MAUI: making smartphones last longer with code offload
Cuervo, E., Balasubramanian, A., Cho, D.-K., Wolman, A., Saroiu, S., Chandra, R., & Bahl, P. (2010) · Proceedings of the 8th international conference on Mobile systems, applications, and services · doi:10.1145/1814433.1814441 · Cited by 2,281
Low Latency Geo-distributed Data Analytics
Pu, Q., Ananthanarayanan, G., Bodik, P., Kandula, S., Akella, A., Bahl, P., & Stoica, I. (2015) · Proceedings of the 2015 ACM Conference on Special Interest Group on Data Communication · doi:10.1145/2785956.2787505 · Cited by 246
Cited by
All one needs to know about fog computing and related edge computing paradigms: A complete survey
Yousefpour, A., Fung, C., Nguyen, T., Kadiyala, K., Jalali, F., Niakanlahiji, A., Kong, J., & Jue, J. P. (2019) · Journal of Systems Architecture · doi:10.1016/j.sysarc.2019.02.009 · Cited by 1,368
Fog Computing for Energy-Aware Load Balancing and Scheduling in Smart Factory
Wan, J., Chen, B., Wang, S., Xia, M., Li, D., & Liu, C. (2018) · IEEE Transactions on Industrial Informatics · doi:10.1109/tii.2018.2818932 · Cited by 322
The Security of Big Data in Fog-Enabled IoT Applications Including Blockchain: A Survey
Tariq, N., Asim, M., Al-Obeidat, F., Zubair Farooqi, M., Baker, T., Hammoudeh, M., & Ghafir, I. (2019) · Sensors · doi:10.3390/s19081788 · Cited by 268
Multi-tier computing networks for intelligent IoT
Yang, Y. (2019) · Nature Electronics · doi:10.1038/s41928-018-0195-9 · Cited by 167
Metadata
- Authors
- Byers, C. C.
- Venue
- IEEE Communications Magazine
- Published
- 2017-08
- Volume
- 55
- Issue
- 8
- Pages
- 14-20
- ISSN
- 0163-6804 (ISSN-L)
- 1558-1896
- OpenAlex
- W2743702376
- Cited by
- 194
- References
- 4
- FWCI
- 19.81
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Architectural Imperatives for Fog Computing: Use Cases, Requirements, and Architectural Techniques for Fog-Enabled IoT Networks. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1109/mcom.2017.1600885
- The paper
- Byers, C. C. (2017). Architectural Imperatives for Fog Computing: Use Cases, Requirements, and Architectural Techniques for Fog-Enabled IoT Networks. IEEE Communications Magazine. https://doi.org/10.1109/mcom.2017.1600885
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
