Cited by 800Software-Defined Networks and 5GAdvanced Wireless Network OptimizationAdvanced Optical Network Technologies

Network Slicing Based 5G and Future Mobile Networks: Mobility, Resource Management, and Challenges

Open access
Zhang, Haijun, Liu, Na, Chu, Xiaoli, Long, Keping, Aghvami, Abdol-Hamid, Leung, Victor C. M.·2017·IEEE Communications Magazine

Abstract

5G networks are expected to be able to satisfy users' different QoS requirements. Network slicing is a promising technology for 5G networks to provide services tailored for users' specific QoS demands. Driven by the increased massive wireless data traffic from different application scenarios, efficient resource allocation schemes should be exploited to improve the flexibility of network resource allocation and capacity of 5G networks based on network slicing. Due to the diversity of 5G application scenarios, new mobility management schemes are greatly needed to guarantee seamless handover in network-slicing-based 5G systems. In this article, we introduce a logical architecture for network-slicing-based 5G systems, and present a scheme for managing mobility between different access networks, as well as a joint power and subchannel allocation scheme in spectrum-sharing two-tier systems based on network slicing, where both the co-tier interference and cross-tier interference are taken into account. Simulation results demonstrate that the proposed resource allocation scheme can flexibly allocate network resources between different slices in 5G systems. Finally, several open issues and challenges in network-slicing-based 5G networks are discussed, including network reconstruction, network slicing management, and cooperation with other 5G technologies.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1109/mcom.2017.1600940

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The priority assumption can be supported by mechanisms developed for 5G, such as network slicing or preemption techniques.

    “This priority assumption can be supported by mechanisms developed for 5G, such as network slicing or preemption techniques.”

    From Cross-layer latency analysis for 5G NR in V2X communications (2025) · cites this paper as [25]

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Zhang, H., Liu, N., Chu, X., Long, K., Aghvami, A.-H., & Leung, V. C. M.
Affiliations
  • University of Science and Technology Beijing (CN)
  • University of Sheffield (GB)
  • King's College London (GB)
  • University of British Columbia (CA)
Venue
IEEE Communications Magazine
Published
2017-08
Volume
55
Issue
8
Pages
138-145
ISSN
  • 0163-6804 (ISSN-L)
  • 1558-1896
OpenAlex
W2604174486
Cited by
800
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 37 · 2025: 72 · 2024: 51 · 2023: 66 · 2022: 78 · 2021: 99 · 2020: 141 · 2019: 123 · 2018: 97 · 2017: 36
FWCI
72.31
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • IEEE Communications Magazine (publishedVersion)
  • White Rose Research Online (University of Leeds, The University of Sheffield, University of York) (acceptedVersion)
  • arXiv (Cornell University) (submittedVersion)
  • arXiv (Cornell University)
Funders
  • National Natural Science Foundation of China (61471025)
  • Xidian University (ISN17-02)
  • State Key Laboratory of Integrated Services Networks
  • Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Networks and Communications › Software-Defined Networks and 5G
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Electrical and Electronic Engineering › Advanced Wireless Network Optimization
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Electrical and Electronic Engineering › Advanced Optical Network Technologies
Keywords
network slicing, 5G, mobility management, resource allocation, spectrum sharing, two-tier system, handover, quality of service, co-tier interference, cross-tier interference, network inference, next generation mobile networks

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review