A Privacy-Preserving Lightweight Biometric System for Internet of Things Security
Abstract
Constant expansion of Internet of Things (IoT) devices creates considerable convenience for peoples' daily lives; however, it also brings about some challenges. Advanced modern techniques equip IoT devices with additional sensory and communication modules, enabling them to perform more functions than just sensing, but it also means that these devices may consume more energy. Many IoT devices are powered by batteries of limited life and composed of electronic parts of limited capacity. Therefore, energy efficiency is an essential requirement for any IoT device with limited resources in terms of storage space, power, and computing capability. Moreover, possible attack vectors and attack sources for vulnerabilities in the IoT environment present another great challenge for secure user authentication. To address the above issues, in this article we propose a privacy- preserving lightweight biometric system, specifically designed for resource-limited IoT devices to save memory and computational cost. The proposed system employs a block logic operation based algorithm to reduce the biometric feature size in a simple and efficient way. Experimental results demonstrate that with a much reduced feature size, the proposed lightweight biometric system still maintains high recognition accuracy. It is worth noting that any sizable reduction in memory and computing cost is beneficial for resource-constrained IoT devices.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
A lightweight solution using block-based logic transformation reduces feature size and preserves the original feature, making it appealing to resource-limited AIoT devices and resistant to potential attacks.
“Recently, a lightweight solution is proposed in [241] by block-based logic transformation, which not only reduces feature size but also preserves the original feature, therefore appealing to resource-limited AIoT devices and resistant to potential attacks.”
From Empowering things with intelligence: a survey of the progress, challenges, and opportunities in artificial intelligence of things (2021) · cites this paper as [241]
Cites
Internet of Things (IoT): A vision, architectural elements, and future directions
Gubbi, J., Buyya, R., Marusic, S., & Palaniswami, M. (2013) · Future Generation Computer Systems · doi:10.1016/j.future.2013.01.010 · Cited by 12,293 · see citing works
Minutia Cylinder-Code: A New Representation and Matching Technique for Fingerprint Recognition
Cappelli, R., Ferrara, M., & Maltoni, D. (2010) · IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence · doi:10.1109/tpami.2010.52 · Cited by 639 · see citing works
Green Internet of Things for Smart World
Zhu, C., Leung, V. C. M., Shu, L., & Ngai, E. C. ‐. (2015) · IEEE Access · doi:10.1109/access.2015.2497312 · Cited by 496 · see citing works
A fingerprint and finger-vein based cancelable multi-biometric system
Yang, W., Wang, S., Hu, J., Zheng, G., & Valli, C. (2018) · Pattern Recognition · doi:10.1016/j.patcog.2018.01.026 · Cited by 210 · see citing works
Self-citationNoninvertible Minutia Cylinder-Code Representation
Ferrara, M., Maltoni, D., & Cappelli, R. (2012) · IEEE Transactions on Information Forensics and Security · doi:10.1109/tifs.2012.2215326 · Cited by 189 · see citing works
Wang, J., Sun, J., Zhang, X., et al. (2008) · Optics Letters · doi:10.1364/ol.33.001419 · Cited by 77 · see citing works
A two-factor protection scheme for MCC fingerprint templates
Ferrara, M., Maltoni, D., & Cappelli, R. (2014) · Archivio istituzionale della ricerca (Alma Mater Studiorum Università di Bologna) · Cited by 61 · see citing works
Evolving authentication design considerations for the internet of biometric things (IoBT)
Karimian, N., Wortman, P. A., & Tehranipoor, F. (2016) · IEEE/ACM/IFIP International Conference on Hardware/Software Codesign and System Synthesis (CODES+ISSS) · doi:10.1145/2968456.2973748 · Cited by 42 · see citing works
A Novel Authentication Framework Based on Biometric and Radio Fingerprinting for the IoT in eHealth
Habib, K., Torjusen, A. B., & Leister, W. (2014) · doi:10.13140/2.1.3944.1286 · Cited by 27 · see citing works
Establishing Efficient Security Scheme in Home IOT Devices through Biometric Finger Print Technique
Prakash, N. S., & Venkatram, N. (2016) · Indian Journal of Science and Technology · doi:10.17485/ijst/2016/v9i17/93039 · Cited by 22 · see citing works
Roy, S., Chatterjee, S., & Mahapatra, G. (2018) · Journal of Intelligent & Fuzzy Systems · doi:10.3233/jifs-169435 · Cited by 21 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Zhang, J., & Tao, D. (2021) · IEEE Internet of Things Journal · doi:10.1109/jiot.2020.3039359 · Cited by 774 · see citing works
Self-Sovereign Identity: Use-cases, Technologies, and Challenges for Industrial IoT
Bartolomeu, P. C., Vieira, E., Hosseini, S. M., & Ferreira, J. (2019) · 2019 24th IEEE International Conference on Emerging Technologies and Factory Automation (ETFA) · doi:10.1109/etfa.2019.8869262 · Cited by 79 · see citing works
Golec, M., Gill, S. S., Bahsoon, R., & Rana, O. (2022) · IEEE Consumer Electronics Magazine · doi:10.1109/mce.2020.3038040 · Cited by 58 · see citing works
Privacy-Preservation Techniques for IoT Devices: A Systematic Mapping Study
Torre, D., Chennamaneni, A., & Rodriguez, A. (2023) · IEEE Access · doi:10.1109/access.2023.3245524 · Cited by 35 · see citing works
- Authors
- Yang, W., Wang, S., Zheng, G., Yang, J., & Valli, C.
- Affiliations
- Edith Cowan University (AU)
- La Trobe University (AU)
- Tianjin University of Science and Technology (CN)
- Venue
- IEEE Communications Magazine
- Published
- 2019-03
- Volume
- 57
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 84-89
- ISSN
- 0163-6804 (ISSN-L)
- 1558-1896
- OpenAlex
- W2921838567
- Cited by
- 47
- References
- 11
- Citations by year
- 2026: 2 · 2025: 5 · 2024: 8 · 2023: 6 · 2022: 10 · 2021: 4 · 2020: 6 · 2019: 6
- FWCI
- 4.09
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Licence
- Locations
- IEEE Communications Magazine (publishedVersion)
- Edith Cowan University Research Online (Edith Cowan University) (submittedVersion)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Signal Processing › Biometric Identification and Security
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Information Systems › User Authentication and Security Systems
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Networks and Communications › Advanced Authentication Protocols Security
- Keywords
- biometric authentication, Internet of Things security, privacy preservation, resource-constrained devices, energy efficiency, feature size reduction, user authentication, memory and computational cost reduction
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review