Cited by 47Biometric Identification and SecurityUser Authentication and Security SystemsAdvanced Authentication Protocols Security

A Privacy-Preserving Lightweight Biometric System for Internet of Things Security

Yang, Wencheng, Wang, Song, Zheng, Guanglou, Yang, Jucheng, Valli, Craig·2019·IEEE Communications Magazine

Abstract

Constant expansion of Internet of Things (IoT) devices creates considerable convenience for peoples' daily lives; however, it also brings about some challenges. Advanced modern techniques equip IoT devices with additional sensory and communication modules, enabling them to perform more functions than just sensing, but it also means that these devices may consume more energy. Many IoT devices are powered by batteries of limited life and composed of electronic parts of limited capacity. Therefore, energy efficiency is an essential requirement for any IoT device with limited resources in terms of storage space, power, and computing capability. Moreover, possible attack vectors and attack sources for vulnerabilities in the IoT environment present another great challenge for secure user authentication. To address the above issues, in this article we propose a privacy- preserving lightweight biometric system, specifically designed for resource-limited IoT devices to save memory and computational cost. The proposed system employs a block logic operation based algorithm to reduce the biometric feature size in a simple and efficient way. Experimental results demonstrate that with a much reduced feature size, the proposed lightweight biometric system still maintains high recognition accuracy. It is worth noting that any sizable reduction in memory and computing cost is beneficial for resource-constrained IoT devices.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1109/mcom.2019.1800378

Cites

11 of 11 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • A lightweight solution using block-based logic transformation reduces feature size and preserves the original feature, making it appealing to resource-limited AIoT devices and resistant to potential attacks.

    “Recently, a lightweight solution is proposed in [241] by block-based logic transformation, which not only reduces feature size but also preserves the original feature, therefore appealing to resource-limited AIoT devices and resistant to potential attacks.”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Yang, W., Wang, S., Zheng, G., Yang, J., & Valli, C.
Affiliations
  • Edith Cowan University (AU)
  • La Trobe University (AU)
  • Tianjin University of Science and Technology (CN)
Venue
IEEE Communications Magazine
Published
2019-03
Volume
57
Issue
3
Pages
84-89
ISSN
  • 0163-6804 (ISSN-L)
  • 1558-1896
OpenAlex
W2921838567
Cited by
47
References
11
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 5 · 2024: 8 · 2023: 6 · 2022: 10 · 2021: 4 · 2020: 6 · 2019: 6
FWCI
4.09
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • IEEE Communications Magazine (publishedVersion)
  • Edith Cowan University Research Online (Edith Cowan University) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Signal Processing › Biometric Identification and Security
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Information Systems › User Authentication and Security Systems
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Networks and Communications › Advanced Authentication Protocols Security
Keywords
biometric authentication, Internet of Things security, privacy preservation, resource-constrained devices, energy efficiency, feature size reduction, user authentication, memory and computational cost reduction

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review