Restoring lost cognitive function.
Abstract
A prosthetic device that functions in a biomimetic manner to replace information transmission between cortical brain regions is considered. In such a prosthesis, damaged CNS neurons is replaced with a biomimetic system comprised of silicon neurons. The replacement silicon neurons would have functional properties specific to those of the damaged neurons and would both receive as inputs and send as outputs electrical activity to regions of the brain with which the damaged region previously communicated. Thus, the class of prosthesis proposed is one that would replace the computational function of the damaged brain and restore the transmission of that computational result to other regions of the nervous system.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
BMI technology is currently pursued via invasive neural interfaces composed of neural microchip sensor arrays that contain a plurality of electrodes that can detect multicellular signals, available for several brain areas.
“Brain–machine interface technology is currently being pursued via invasive neural interfaces composed of neural microchip sensor arrays that contain a plurality of electrodes that can detect multicellular signals. These are available for several brain areas (e.g., visual cortex, motor cortex neuroprosthetics, hippocampus, and others) (Berger et al., 2005; BrainGate, 2009).”
From Human Brain/Cloud Interface (2019) · cites this paper as Berger et al., 2005
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Martins, N. R. B., Angelica, A., Chakravarthy, K., Svidinenko, Y., Boehm, F. J., Opris, I., Lebedev, M. A., Swan, M., Garan, S. A., Rosenfeld, J. V., et al. (2019) · Frontiers in Neuroscience · doi:10.3389/fnins.2019.00112 · Cited by 91 · see citing works
- Authors
- Berger, T. W., Ahuja, A., Courellis, S. H., Deadwyler, S. A., Erinjippurath, G., Gerhardt, G. A., Gholmieh, G., Granacki, J. J., Hampson, R., Hsaio, M. C., Lacoss, J., Marmarelis, V. Z., Nasiatka, P., Srinivasan, V., Song, D., Tanguay, A. R., & Wills, J.
- Affiliations
- University of Southern California (US)
- University of Kentucky (US)
- Wake Forest University (US)
- American Institute for Medical and Biological Engineering (US)
- Venue
- IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Magazine
- Published
- 2005-09
- Volume
- 24
- Issue
- 5
- Pages
- 30-44
- ISSN
- 0739-5175 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2002501563
- Cited by
- 148
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2026: 1 · 2025: 4 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 6 · 2022: 9 · 2021: 5 · 2020: 2 · 2019: 4 · 2018: 3 · 2017: 4 · 2016: 4 · 2015: 9 · 2014: 12 · 2013: 6 · 2012: 14
- FWCI
- 0.69
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Magazine (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Funders
- National Institute of Mental Health
- Topics
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience › Neuroscience and Neural Engineering
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Neural dynamics and brain function
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › EEG and Brain-Computer Interfaces
- Keywords
- neuroprosthetics, brain-computer interface
- MeSH terms
- Artificial Intelligence, Cognition Disorders, Electrodes, Implanted, Equipment Design, Hippocampus, Humans, Microelectrodes, Therapy, Computer-Assisted, User-Computer Interface, Equipment Failure Analysis, Biomimetics, Deep Brain Stimulation
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
