Cited by 1,101Logic, Reasoning, and KnowledgeLogic, programming, and type systemsAI-based Problem Solving and Planning

The Art of Prolog

Sterling, Leon, Shapiro, Ehud, Garrett, Randy·1987·IEEE Expert

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1109/mex.1987.4307074

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Sterling, L., Shapiro, E., & Garrett, R.
Affiliations
SAIC 5400 Jeffery Ave. West Palm Beach, FL 33047
Venue
IEEE Expert
Published
1987-06
Volume
2
Issue
2
Pages
106-107
ISSN
  • 0885-9000 (ISSN-L)
  • 2374-9407
OpenAlex
W2023578426
Cited by
1,101
References
0
Citations by year
2024: 2 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 8 · 2020: 7 · 2019: 8 · 2018: 7 · 2017: 3 · 2016: 9 · 2015: 10 · 2014: 13 · 2013: 10 · 2012: 17
Type
book review
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
IEEE Expert (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Logic, Reasoning, and Knowledge
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Logic, programming, and type systems
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › AI-based Problem Solving and Planning
Keywords
Prolog, logic programming, programming languages, declarative programming

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review