Cited by 141Remote-Sensing Image ClassificationRemote Sensing and Land UseDomain Adaptation and Few-Shot Learning

SSL4EO-S12: A large-scale multimodal, multitemporal dataset for self-supervised learning in Earth observation [Software and Data Sets]

Wang, Yi, Braham, Nassim Ait Ali, Xiong, Zhitong, Liu, Chenying, Albrecht, Conrad M., Zhu, Xiao Xiang·2023·IEEE Geoscience and Remote Sensing Magazine

Abstract

Self-supervised pretraining bears the potential to generate expressive representations from large-scale Earth observation (EO) data without human annotation. However, most existing pretraining in the field is based on ImageNet or medium-sized, labeled remote sensing (RS) datasets. In this article, we share an unlabeled datasetSelf-Supervised Learning for Earth Observation-Sentinel-1/2(SSL4EO-S12) to assemble a large-scale, global, multimodal, and multiseasonal corpus of satellite imagery. We demonstrate SSL4EO-S12 to succeed in self-supervised pretraining for a set of representative methods: momentum contrast (MoCo), self-distillation with no labels (DINO), masked autoencoders (MAE), and data2vec, and multiple downstream applications, including scene classification, semantic segmentation, and change detection. Our benchmark results prove the effectiveness of SSL4EO-S12 compared to existing datasets. The dataset, related source code, and pretrained models are available athttps://github.com/zhu-xlab/SSL4EO-S12.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1109/mgrs.2023.3281651

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • For segmentation tasks, Prithvi-EO-2.0-600M-TL and Prithvi-EO-2.0-600M show the highest performance, with a noticeable margin over the next best models, DeCUR and DINO ResNets.

    “For segmentation, Prithvi-EO-2.0-600M-TL and Prithvi-EO-2.0-600M show the highest performance, with a noticeable margin over the next best models, DeCUR [7] and DINO [12] ResNets.”

No citation lists for this paper

No citation lists for this paper yet — checked again daily.

References 27 · Cited by 141

Authors
Wang, Y., Braham, N. A. A., Xiong, Z., Liu, C., Albrecht, C. M., & Zhu, X. X.
Affiliations
  • Technical University of Munich (DE)
  • Deutsches Zentrum für Luft- und Raumfahrt e. V. (DLR) (DE)
Venue
IEEE Geoscience and Remote Sensing Magazine
Published
2023-09
Volume
11
Issue
3
Pages
98-106
ISSN
  • 2168-6831 (ISSN-L)
  • 2473-2397
  • 2373-7468
OpenAlex
W4387026640
Cited by
141
References
27
Citations by year
2026: 46 · 2025: 52 · 2024: 38 · 2023: 5
FWCI
17.78
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • IEEE Geoscience and Remote Sensing Magazine (publishedVersion)
  • elib (German Aerospace Center) (acceptedVersion)
Funders
  • Helmholtz Association (ZT-I-PF-5-01)
  • Helmholtz Excellent Professorship (W2-W3-100)
  • German Federal Ministry of Education and Research (01DD20001)
  • German Federal Ministry for Economic Affairs and Climate Action (50EE2201C)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Media Technology › Remote-Sensing Image Classification
  • Physical Sciences › Earth and Planetary Sciences › Atmospheric Science › Remote Sensing and Land Use
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Domain Adaptation and Few-Shot Learning
Keywords
self-supervised pre-training, Earth observation, satellite imagery, Sentinel-1, Sentinel-2, multimodal remote sensing, multi-temporal imagery, momentum contrast, DINO, masked autoencoder, data2vec, scene classification, semantic segmentation, change detection, pre-trained models

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review