SSL4EO-S12: A large-scale multimodal, multitemporal dataset for self-supervised learning in Earth observation [Software and Data Sets]
Abstract
Self-supervised pretraining bears the potential to generate expressive representations from large-scale Earth observation (EO) data without human annotation. However, most existing pretraining in the field is based on ImageNet or medium-sized, labeled remote sensing (RS) datasets. In this article, we share an unlabeled datasetSelf-Supervised Learning for Earth Observation-Sentinel-1/2(SSL4EO-S12) to assemble a large-scale, global, multimodal, and multiseasonal corpus of satellite imagery. We demonstrate SSL4EO-S12 to succeed in self-supervised pretraining for a set of representative methods: momentum contrast (MoCo), self-distillation with no labels (DINO), masked autoencoders (MAE), and data2vec, and multiple downstream applications, including scene classification, semantic segmentation, and change detection. Our benchmark results prove the effectiveness of SSL4EO-S12 compared to existing datasets. The dataset, related source code, and pretrained models are available athttps://github.com/zhu-xlab/SSL4EO-S12.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
For segmentation tasks, Prithvi-EO-2.0-600M-TL and Prithvi-EO-2.0-600M show the highest performance, with a noticeable margin over the next best models, DeCUR and DINO ResNets.
“For segmentation, Prithvi-EO-2.0-600M-TL and Prithvi-EO-2.0-600M show the highest performance, with a noticeable margin over the next best models, DeCUR [7] and DINO [12] ResNets.”
From Prithvi-EO-2.0: A Versatile Multitemporal Foundation Model for Earth Observation Applications (2026) · cites this paper as [12]
No citation lists for this paper
No citation lists for this paper yet — checked again daily.
References 27 · Cited by 141
- Authors
- Wang, Y., Braham, N. A. A., Xiong, Z., Liu, C., Albrecht, C. M., & Zhu, X. X.
- Affiliations
- Technical University of Munich (DE)
- Deutsches Zentrum für Luft- und Raumfahrt e. V. (DLR) (DE)
- Venue
- IEEE Geoscience and Remote Sensing Magazine
- Published
- 2023-09
- Volume
- 11
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 98-106
- ISSN
- 2168-6831 (ISSN-L)
- 2473-2397
- 2373-7468
- OpenAlex
- W4387026640
- Cited by
- 141
- References
- 27
- Citations by year
- 2026: 46 · 2025: 52 · 2024: 38 · 2023: 5
- FWCI
- 17.78
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Licence
- Locations
- IEEE Geoscience and Remote Sensing Magazine (publishedVersion)
- elib (German Aerospace Center) (acceptedVersion)
- Funders
- Helmholtz Association (ZT-I-PF-5-01)
- Helmholtz Excellent Professorship (W2-W3-100)
- German Federal Ministry of Education and Research (01DD20001)
- German Federal Ministry for Economic Affairs and Climate Action (50EE2201C)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Engineering › Media Technology › Remote-Sensing Image Classification
- Physical Sciences › Earth and Planetary Sciences › Atmospheric Science › Remote Sensing and Land Use
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Domain Adaptation and Few-Shot Learning
- Keywords
- self-supervised pre-training, Earth observation, satellite imagery, Sentinel-1, Sentinel-2, multimodal remote sensing, multi-temporal imagery, momentum contrast, DINO, masked autoencoder, data2vec, scene classification, semantic segmentation, change detection, pre-trained models
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review