The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Utility-Based Cache Partitioning: A Low-Overhead, High-Performance, Runtime Mechanism to Partition Shared Caches
Abstract
This paper investigates the problem of partitioning a shared cache between multiple concurrently executing applications. The commonly used LRU policy implicitly partitions a shared cache on a demand basis, giving more cache resources to the application that has a high demand and fewer cache resources to the application that has a low demand. However, a higher demand for cache resources does not always correlate with a higher performance from additional cache resources. It is beneficial for performance to invest cache resources in the application that benefits more from the cache resources rather than in the application that has more demand for the cache resources. This paper proposes utility-based cache partitioning (UCP), a low-overhead, runtime mechanism that partitions a shared cache between multiple applications depending on the reduction in cache misses that each application is likely to obtain for a given amount of cache resources. The proposed mechanism monitors each application at runtime using a novel, cost-effective, hardware circuit that requires less than 2kB of storage. The information collected by the monitoring circuits is used by a partitioning algorithm to decide the amount of cache resources allocated to each application. Our evaluation, with 20 multiprogrammed workloads, shows that UCP improves performance of a dual-core system by up to 23% and on average 11% over LRU-based cache partitioning
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Heracles: improving resource efficiency at scale
Lo, D., Cheng, L., Govindaraju, R., Ranganathan, P., & Kozyrakis, C. (2015) · Proceedings of the 42nd Annual International Symposium on Computer Architecture · doi:10.1145/2749469.2749475 · Cited by 466
3D-Stacked Memory Architectures for Multi-core Processors
Loh, G. H. (2008) · 2008 International Symposium on Computer Architecture · doi:10.1109/isca.2008.15 · Cited by 438
Cooperative Caching for Chip Multiprocessors
Chang, J., & Sohi, G. S. (2006) · ACM SIGARCH Computer Architecture News · doi:10.1145/1150019.1136509 · Cited by 355
A Utility Optimization Approach to Network Cache Design
Dehghan, M., Massoulie, L., Towsley, D., Menasche, D. S., & Tay, Y. C. (2019) · IEEE/ACM Transactions on Networking · doi:10.1109/tnet.2019.2913677 · Cited by 81
Metadata
- Authors
- Qureshi, M., & Patt, Y.
- Venue
- 2006 39th Annual IEEE/ACM International Symposium on Microarchitecture (MICRO'06)
- Publisher
- IEEE
- Published
- 2006-12
- Pages
- 423-432
- ISSN
- 1072-4451 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2143773524
- Cited by
- 1,094
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 22.78
- Type
- conference paper
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.