Cited by 594Advanced Battery Technologies ResearchReliability and Maintenance OptimizationFault Detection and Control Systems

Prognostics in Battery Health Management

Goebel, Kai, Saha, Bhaskar, Saxena, Abhinav, Celaya, Jose, Christophersen, Jon·2008·IEEE Instrumentation & Measurement Magazine

Abstract

In this article, we examine prognostics and health management (PHM) issues using battery health management of Gen 2 cells, an 18650-size lithium-ion cell, as a test case. We will show where advanced regression, classification, and state estimation algorithms have an important role in the solution of the problem and in the data collection scheme for battery health management that we used for this case study.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1109/mim.2008.4579269

Cites

10 of 10 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • For the Kalman filter family, the state space PDF remains Gaussian at every iteration and the filter equations propagate and update the mean and covariance of the distribution.

    “For the KF family, the state space PDF remains Gaussian at every iteration and the filter equations propagate and update the mean and covariance of the distribution [120].”
  • GPR is a kernel based ML method that can realize prognostics combined with prior knowledge based on a Bayesian framework and provide variance around its mean prediction to describe associated uncertainty.

    “GPR is a kernel based ML method, which can realize prognostics combined with prior knowledge based on a Bayesian framework and provide variance around its mean prediction to describe the associated uncertainty [120].”
  • Capturing the conditional distribution to capture prediction uncertainty level is a real challenge due to uncertainties from various sources such as measurements, state estimation, model inaccuracies, and future load uncertainty.

    “Ideally, however, the conditional distribution in order to capture the prediction uncertainty level, is a real challenge due to uncertainties from various sources such as measurements, state estimation, model inaccuracies, and future load uncertainty [120].”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

1 of the 11 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Goebel, K., Saha, B., Saxena, A., Celaya, J., & Christophersen, J.
Affiliations
  • Ames Research Center (US)
  • Idaho National Laboratory (US)
Venue
IEEE Instrumentation & Measurement Magazine
Published
2008-08
Volume
11
Issue
4
Pages
33-40
ISSN
1094-6969 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2115233498
Cited by
594
References
11
Citations by year
2026: 21 · 2025: 46 · 2024: 46 · 2023: 62 · 2022: 46 · 2021: 59 · 2020: 40 · 2019: 48 · 2018: 39 · 2017: 29 · 2016: 26 · 2015: 28 · 2014: 34 · 2013: 24 · 2012: 17
FWCI
22.97
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
IEEE Instrumentation & Measurement Magazine (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Automotive Engineering › Advanced Battery Technologies Research
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Safety, Risk, Reliability and Quality › Reliability and Maintenance Optimization
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Control and Systems Engineering › Fault Detection and Control Systems
Keywords
prognostics and health management, battery health management, lithium-ion cells, 18650 cells, battery degradation prediction, regression analysis, classification, state estimation

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review