Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 229

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 5 of the 5 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Trust in Automation

Hoffman, Robert R., Johnson, Matthew, Bradshaw, Jeffrey M., Underbrink, Al·2013·IEEE Intelligent Systems
DOI 10.1109/mis.2013.24
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Abstract

This essay focuses on trust in the automation within macrocognitive work systems. The authors emphasize the dynamics of trust. They consider numerous different meanings or kinds of trust, and different modes of operation in which trust dynamics play a role. Their goal is to contribute to the development of a methodology for designing and analyzing collaborative human-centered work systems, a methodology that might promote both trust "calibration" and appropriate reliance. The analysis suggests an ontology for what the authors call "active exploration for trusting" (AET).

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1109/mis.2013.24

Cites

5 of 5 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 5 references

Research works printed but not linked: 20

  1. 10.1518/hfes.46.1.50.30392 · doi:10.1518/hfes.46.1.50.30392 · Paper page
  2. 10.1016/j.ergon.2008.01.007 · DOI · Paper page
  3. 10.1177/1071181312561062 · DOI
  4. 10.1518/001872007X230154 · DOI · Paper page
  5. sheridan, 1978, Human and Computer Control of Undersea Teleoperators, MIT Man-Machine Systems Laboratory Tech Rep
  6. 10.1175/WAF927.1 · DOI
  7. 10.1080/14639220903009896 · DOI
  8. sheridan, 1980, Computer Control and Human Alienation, Technology Rev, 83, 61
  9. 2012, The Role of Autonomy in DoD Systems, Task Force Report
  10. fitzhugh, 2011, Active Trust Management, Trust in Military Teams, 197
  11. 10.1109/MIS.2009.124 · DOI · Paper page
  12. 10.1007/11532095_2 · DOI
  13. 10.5465/AMR.1995.9508080335 · doi:10.5465/amr.1995.9508080335 · Paper page
  14. hawley, 2011, Not By Widgets Alone, Armed Forces Journal
  15. 2007, Unmanned Systems Roadmap 2011–2036, Office of the Undersecretary of Defense for Acquisition Technology and Logistics Dept of Defense
  16. klein, 1992, Seeing the Invisible: Perceptual-Cognitive Aspects of Expertise, Cognitive Science Foundations of Instruction, 203
  17. woods, 0, Reflections on 30 Years of Picking Up the Pieces After Explosions of Technology, AFRL Autonomy Workshop
  18. 10.1109/MIS.2003.1249172 · DOI
  19. 10.1109/MIS.2011.32 · DOI
  20. roth, 0, Facilitating 'Calibrated’ Trust in Technology of Dynamically Changing 'Trust-Worthiness,‘, Working Meeting on Trust in Cyberdomains

Cited by

See all 229

Metadata

Authors
Hoffman, R. R., Johnson, M., Bradshaw, J. M., & Underbrink, A.
Venue
IEEE Intelligent Systems
Publisher
Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers (IEEE)
Published
2013-01
Volume
28
Issue
1
Pages
84-88
ISSN
1541-1672 (ISSN-L)
DOI
10.1109/mis.2013.24
OpenAlex
W2027103861
Cited by
229
References
5
FWCI
10.99
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Licence
ieeexplore.ieee.org/Xplorehelp/downloads/license-information/IEEE.html (vor)

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Trust in Automation. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1109/mis.2013.24
The paper
Hoffman, R. R., Johnson, M., Bradshaw, J. M., & Underbrink, A. (2013). Trust in Automation. IEEE Intelligent Systems. https://doi.org/10.1109/mis.2013.24

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.