Cited by 79Forecasting Techniques and ApplicationsStock Market Forecasting MethodsSentiment Analysis and Opinion Mining

Predicting Elections for Multiple Countries Using Twitter and Polls

Open access
Tsakalidis, Adam, Papadopoulos, Symeon, Cristea, Alexandra I., Kompatsiaris, Yiannis·2015·IEEE Intelligent Systems

Abstract

The authors' work focuses on predicting the 2014 European Union elections in three different countries using Twitter and polls. Past works in this domain relying strictly on Twitter data have been proven ineffective. Others, using polls as their ground truth, have raised questions regarding the contribution of Twitter data for this task. Here, the authors treat this task as a multivariate time-series forecast, extracting Twitter- and poll-based features and training different predictive algorithms. They've achieved better results than several past works and the commercial baseline.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1109/mis.2015.17

Cites

10 of 10 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. Lei Shi, Neeraj Agarwal, Ankur Agrawal, Rahul Garg, and Jacob Spoel- stra. Predicting us primary elections with twitter. In Proceedings of Social Network and Social Media Analysis: Methods, Models and Ap- plications (NIPS Workshop), Lake Tahoe, NV, December, volume 7, 2012.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Tsakalidis, A., Papadopoulos, S., Cristea, A. I., & Kompatsiaris, Y.
Affiliations
  • University of Warwick (GB)
  • Information Technologies Institute (GR)
Venue
IEEE Intelligent Systems
Published
2015-03
Volume
30
Issue
2
Pages
10-17
ISSN
1541-1672 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2060747203
Cited by
79
References
10
Citations by year
2026: 4 · 2025: 2 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 6 · 2021: 11 · 2020: 14 · 2019: 11 · 2018: 13 · 2017: 5 · 2016: 7 · 2015: 2
FWCI
11.25
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • IEEE Intelligent Systems (publishedVersion)
  • Warwick Research Archive Portal (University of Warwick) (acceptedVersion)
  • Durham Research Online (Durham University) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › Management Science and Operations Research › Forecasting Techniques and Applications
  • Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › Management Science and Operations Research › Stock Market Forecasting Methods
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Sentiment Analysis and Opinion Mining
Keywords
election forecasting, 2014 European Parliament elections, Twitter, public opinion survey, multivariate time series forecasting, feature extraction, predictive algorithms

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review