Cited by 61Digitalization, Law, and RegulationSafety Systems Engineering in AutonomyEthics and Social Impacts of AI

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 5 of the 5 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Regulating Autonomous Systems: Beyond Standards

Danks, David, London, Alex John·2017·IEEE Intelligent Systems

Abstract

Autonomous systems are on the verge of widespread use, but there are significant challenges to ensuring their safe and appropriate development, deployment, and application. The authors argue that autonomous systems cannot, in general, be regulated using traditional performance standards. They contend that these systems should instead be evaluated by a staged, iterative regulatory approach similar to that for pharmaceuticals and medical devices. This article outlines some features of such a system.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1109/mis.2017.1

Cites

5 of 5 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 5

  1. 2016, Federal Automated Vehicles Policy Accelerating the Next Revolution in Roadway Safety
  2. maurer, 2015, Autonomous Driving Technical Legal and Social Aspects
  3. scharre, 2016, Autonomous Weapons and Operational Risk
  4. davies, 2016, Google's Self-Driving Car Caused Its First Crash, Wired
  5. vlasic, 2016, ‘Self-Driving Tesla Was Involved in Fatal Crash ’ U S Says

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Danks, D., & London, A. J.
Affiliations
Carnegie Mellon University (US)
Venue
IEEE Intelligent Systems
Published
2017-01
Volume
32
Issue
1
Pages
88-91
ISSN
1541-1672 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2588936615
Cited by
61
References
5
Citations by year
2026: 5 · 2025: 6 · 2024: 10 · 2023: 5 · 2022: 8 · 2021: 5 · 2020: 4 · 2019: 8 · 2018: 9 · 2017: 1
FWCI
61.95
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
IEEE Intelligent Systems (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Law › Digitalization, Law, and Regulation
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Safety, Risk, Reliability and Quality › Safety Systems Engineering in Autonomy
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Ethics and Social Impacts of AI
Keywords
autonomous systems, regulation, performance standards, iterative evaluation, safety, medical device regulation, drug regulation, technology governance

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review