Cited by 250Autonomous Vehicle Technology and SafetyVehicle Dynamics and Control SystemsHuman-Automation Interaction and Safety

Experience, Results and Lessons Learned from Automated Driving on Germany's Highways

Aeberhard, Michael, Rauch, Sebastian, Bahram, Mohammad, Tanzmeister, Georg, Thomas, Julian, Pilat, Yves, Homm, Florian, Huber, Werner +1 more·2015·IEEE Intelligent Transportation Systems Magazine

Abstract

The BMW Group Research and Technology has been testing automated vehicles on Germany's highways since Spring 2011. Since then, thousands of kilometers have been driven on the highways around Munich, Germany. Throughout this project, fundamental technologies, such as environment perception, localization, driving strategy and vehicle control, were developed in order to safely operate prototype automated vehicles in real traffic with speeds up to 130 km/h. The goal of this project was to learn what technologies are necessary for automated driving. This paper presents the architecture and algorithms developed during this project, results from real driving scenarios, the lessons learned throughout the project and a quick introduction into the latest developments for improving the system.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1109/mits.2014.2360306

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Due to the high uncertainty of the predictions that autonomous vehicles may make in different driving scenarios, it is impossible and impractical to meet all the requirements to validate and test autonomous cars.

    “Therefore, due to the high uncertainty of the predictions that these vehicles may make in different driving scenarios, it is impossible and impractical to meet all the requirements to validate and test autonomous cars [102].”
  • Current standards cannot be applied to an autonomous vehicle because of its ability to make sole decisions, unlike traditional cars that require humans to make these decisions.

    “However, these standards can not be applied to an autonomous vehicle because of its ability to make sole decisions, unlike traditional cars that require humans to make these decisions.”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Aeberhard, M., Rauch, S., Bahram, M., Tanzmeister, G., Thomas, J., Pilat, Y., Homm, F., Huber, W., & Kaempchen, N.
Affiliations
BMW (Germany) (DE)
Venue
IEEE Intelligent Transportation Systems Magazine
Published
2015
Volume
7
Issue
1
Pages
42-57
ISSN
  • 1939-1390 (ISSN-L)
  • 1941-1197
OpenAlex
W2045531847
Cited by
250
References
1
Citations by year
2026: 4 · 2025: 12 · 2024: 7 · 2023: 15 · 2022: 14 · 2021: 17 · 2020: 30 · 2019: 37 · 2018: 39 · 2017: 40 · 2016: 24 · 2015: 10 · 2014: 1
FWCI
38.86
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
IEEE Intelligent Transportation Systems Magazine (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Automotive Engineering › Autonomous Vehicle Technology and Safety
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Automotive Engineering › Vehicle Dynamics and Control Systems
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Human-Automation Interaction and Safety
Keywords
autonomous driving, highway driving, environmental perception, vehicle localization, driving strategy, vehicle control, lessons learned, BMW Group

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review