The DOI matches its Crossref record; 13 of the 13 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Toward publicly auditable secure cloud data storage services
Abstract
Cloud computing is the long dreamed vision of computing as a utility, where data owners can remotely store their data in the cloud to enjoy on-demand high-quality applications and services from a shared pool of configurable computing resources. While data outsourcing relieves the owners of the burden of local data storage and maintenance, it also eliminates their physical control of storage dependability and security, which traditionally has been expected by both enterprises and individuals with high service-level requirements. In order to facilitate rapid deployment of cloud data storage service and regain security assurances with outsourced data dependability, efficient methods that enable on-demand data correctness verification on behalf of cloud data owners have to be designed. In this article we propose that publicly auditable cloud data storage is able to help this nascent cloud economy become fully established. With public auditability, a trusted entity with expertise and capabilities data owners do not possess can be delegated as an external audit party to assess the risk of outsourced data when needed. Such an auditing service not only helps save data owners¿ computation resources but also provides a transparent yet cost-effective method for data owners to gain trust in the cloud. We describe approaches and system requirements that should be brought into consideration, and outline challenges that need to be resolved for such a publicly auditable secure cloud storage service to become a reality.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Above the Clouds: A Berkeley View of Cloud Computing
Armbrust, M., Fox, A., Griffith, R., Joseph, A. D., Katz, R. H., Konwinski, A., Lee, G., Patterson, D. A., Rabkin, A., Stoica, I. G., et al. (2009) · Cited by 5,796
Provable data possession at untrusted stores
Ateniese, G., Burns, R., Curtmola, R., Herring, J., Kissner, L., Peterson, Z., & Song, D. (2007) · Proceedings of the 14th ACM conference on Computer and communications security · doi:10.1145/1315245.1315318 · Cited by 2,705
Pors: proofs of retrievability for large files
Juels, A., & Kaliski, B. S. (2007) · Proceedings of the 14th ACM conference on Computer and communications security · doi:10.1145/1315245.1315317 · Cited by 1,894
Aggregate and Verifiably Encrypted Signatures from Bilinear Maps
Boneh, D., Gentry, C., Lynn, B., & Shacham, H. (2003) · Lecture Notes in Computer Science · doi:10.1007/3-540-39200-9_26 · Cited by 1,821
Protocols for Public Key Cryptosystems
Merkle, R. C. (1980) · 1980 IEEE Symposium on Security and Privacy · doi:10.1109/sp.1980.10006 · Cited by 1,418
Privacy-Preserving Public Auditing for Data Storage Security in Cloud Computing
Wang, C., Wang, Q., Ren, K., & Lou, W. (2010) · 2010 Proceedings IEEE INFOCOM · doi:10.1109/infcom.2010.5462173 · Cited by 1,415
Self-citationCompact Proofs of Retrievability
Shacham, H., & Waters, B. (2008) · Lecture Notes in Computer Science · doi:10.1007/978-3-540-89255-7_7 · Cited by 1,395
Scalable and efficient provable data possession
Ateniese, G., Di Pietro, R., Mancini, L. V., & Tsudik, G. (2008) · Proceedings of the 4th international conference on Security and privacy in communication netowrks · doi:10.1145/1460877.1460889 · Cited by 1,129
Dynamic provable data possession
Erway, C., Küpçü, A., Papamanthou, C., & Tamassia, R. (2009) · Proceedings of the 16th ACM conference on Computer and communications security · doi:10.1145/1653662.1653688 · Cited by 897
Enabling Public Verifiability and Data Dynamics for Storage Security in Cloud Computing
Wang, Q., Wang, C., Li, J., Ren, K., & Lou, W. (2009) · Lecture Notes in Computer Science · doi:10.1007/978-3-642-04444-1_22 · Cited by 892
Self-citation
Cited by
Privacy-Preserving Public Auditing for Secure Cloud Storage
Wang, C., Chow, S. S. M., Wang, Q., Ren, K., & Lou, W. (2013) · IEEE Transactions on Computers · doi:10.1109/tc.2011.245 · Cited by 1,374
Self-citationA Survey of Mobile Cloud Computing Application Models
Khan, A. U. R., Othman, M., Madani, S. A., & Khan, S. U. (2014) · IEEE Communications Surveys & Tutorials · doi:10.1109/surv.2013.062613.00160 · Cited by 722
An Efficient and Secure Dynamic Auditing Protocol for Data Storage in Cloud Computing
Yang, K., & Jia, X. (2013) · IEEE Transactions on Parallel and Distributed Systems · doi:10.1109/tpds.2012.278 · Cited by 632
Security issues in cloud environments: a survey
Fernandes, D. A. B., Soares, L. F. B., Gomes, J. V., Freire, M. M., & Inácio, P. R. M. (2014) · International Journal of Information Security · doi:10.1007/s10207-013-0208-7 · Cited by 494
Metadata
- Authors
- Wang, C., Ren, K., Lou, W., & Li, J.
- Venue
- IEEE Network
- Published
- 2010-07
- Volume
- 24
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 19-24
- ISSN
- 0890-8044 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2074769682
- Cited by
- 431
- References
- 13
- FWCI
- 86.74
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Toward publicly auditable secure cloud data storage services. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1109/mnet.2010.5510914
- The paper
- Wang, C., Ren, K., Lou, W., & Li, J. (2010). Toward publicly auditable secure cloud data storage services. IEEE Network. https://doi.org/10.1109/mnet.2010.5510914
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
