Cited by 6Academic integrity and plagiarismSoftware Engineering ResearchTeaching and Learning Programming

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

How Students Plagiarize Modeling Assignments

Sağlam, Timur, Schmid, Larissa, Hahner, Sebastian, Burger, Erik·2023·2023 ACM/IEEE International Conference on Model Driven Engineering Languages and Systems Companion (MODELS-C)

Abstract

Plagiarism is a prevalent issue in computer science education, with students employing various techniques to conceal their plagiarism. While it is essential to understand how students engage in plagiaristic behaviors, it remains unclear how students do so for modeling assignments. To close this gap, we conducted an experiment involving novice modelers, instructing them to plagiarize a modeling assignment while concealing its source. Thus, this paper explores students' specific techniques to conceal modeling plagiarism. Our work initiates a discussion on plagiarism in modeling assignments and sheds light on the challenges associated with detecting and addressing it.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1109/models-c59198.2023.00032

Cites

2 of 2 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Citations

Cites

Research works printed but not linked: 14

  1. 10.1145/1809427.1809428 · DOI
  2. 10.1080/02602930301677 · DOI
  3. 10.1145/3313290 · DOI · Paper page
  4. 10.1109/ICTS.2016.7910274 · DOI · Paper page
  5. 10.1080/08993408.2020.1711495 · DOI
  6. 10.1016/0360-1315(87)90042-X · DOI · Paper page
  7. Prechelt, 2002, Finding plagia-risms among a set of programs with jplag, J. UCS, 8, 1016
  8. 10.1145/3270112.3270129 · DOI
  9. 10.1145/3550356.3556508 · DOI · Paper page
  10. 10.1016/j.cola.2018.12.002 · DOI
  11. Steinberg, 2009, EMF: Eclipse Modeling Framework 2.0
  12. Saglam, 2023, Supplementary Material for How Students Plagiarize Modeling Assignments
  13. 10.5381/jot.2023.22.2.a4 · DOI
  14. 10.1007/978-3-319-15545-6_25 · DOI

Cited by

Sorted by citations

See all 6

Metadata

Authors
Sağlam, T., Schmid, L., Hahner, S., & Burger, E.
Affiliations
Karlsruhe Institute of Technology (DE)
Venue
2023 ACM/IEEE International Conference on Model Driven Engineering Languages and Systems Companion (MODELS-C)
Publisher
IEEE
Published
2023-10-01
Pages
98-101
OpenAlex
W4390098434
Cited by
6
References
2
Citations by year
2025: 2 · 2024: 4
FWCI
1.50
Type
conference paper
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
ACM/IEEE International Conference on Model Driven Engineering Languages and Systems Companion (MODELS-C) (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Education › Academic integrity and plagiarism
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Information Systems › Software Engineering Research
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Science Applications › Teaching and Learning Programming
Keywords
plagiarism, computer science education, novice modelers, plagiarism detection, software modeling

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review