Cited by 430IoT and Edge/Fog ComputingPrivacy-Preserving Technologies in DataInternet of Things and AI

Edge analytics in the internet of things

Open access
Satyanarayanan, Mahadev, Simoens, Pieter, Xiao, Yu, Pillai, Padmanabhan, Chen, Zhuo, Ha, Kiryong, Hu, Wenlu, Amos, Brandon·2015·IEEE Pervasive Computing

Abstract

High-data-rate sensors, such as video cameras, are becoming ubiquitous in the Internet of Things. This article describes GigaSight, an Internet-scale repository of crowd-sourced video content, with strong enforcement of privacy preferences and access controls. The GigaSight architecture is a federated system of VM-based cloudlets that perform video analytics at the edge of the Internet, thus reducing the demand for ingress bandwidth into the cloud. Denaturing, which is an owner-specific reduction in fidelity of video content to preserve privacy, is one form of analytics on cloudlets. Content-based indexing for search is another form of cloudlet-based analytics. This article is part of a special issue on smart spaces.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1109/mprv.2015.32

Cites

9 of 9 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The hierarchical architecture has gradually linked cloudlets to other forms of Edge Computing, particularly as local solutions to high latency and low bandwidth problems for IoT applications.

    “Logically, this hierarchical architecture has gradually linked cloudlets to other forms of Edge Computing, in particular as local solutions to high latency and low bandwidth problems for IoT applications [97].”

    From Edge AI: A survey (2023) · cites this paper as [97]

    The Internet section (page not provided) describes cloudlets as the middle tier of a device–cloudlet–cloud hierarchy. It says cloudlets were originally motivated by latency, while their use in the IoT-focused GigaSight system is based solely on bandwidth. It does not describe a gradual linkage to other forms of edge computing. (LLM, conf=0.85)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • The edge computing paradigm offers a way to process data at the edge of the network to address concerns such as bandwidth saving, as well as data safety and privacy.

    “As noted by Satyanarayanan et al. [32,33] and Shi et al. [34,35], the edge computing paradigm offers a way to process data at the edge of the network to address concerns such as bandwidth saving, as well as data safety and privacy.”
  • Deep learning shows high accuracy while computing a large number of network parameters.

    “Moreover, it shows high accuracy while computing a large number of network parameters[36].”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 2

  1. [1]1. S. Banerjee and D. O. Wu. Final report from the NSF Workshop on Future Directions in Wireless Networking. National Science Foundation, November 2013.
  2. [7]7. H. Haddon. N.J. Mandates Cameras for Its New Police Cars. Wall Street Journal, September 11, 2014.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Satyanarayanan, M., Simoens, P., Xiao, Y., Pillai, P., Chen, Z., Ha, K., Hu, W., & Amos, B.
Affiliations
  • Carnegie Mellon University (US)
  • Ghent University (BE)
  • Aalto University (FI)
  • Intel (United States) (US)
Venue
IEEE Pervasive Computing
Published
2015-04
Volume
14
Issue
2
Pages
24-31
ISSN
1536-1268 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2094547360
Cited by
430
References
9
Citations by year
2026: 7 · 2025: 16 · 2024: 13 · 2023: 20 · 2022: 30 · 2021: 41 · 2020: 70 · 2019: 77 · 2018: 74 · 2017: 53 · 2016: 24 · 2015: 5
FWCI
59.60
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • IEEE Pervasive Computing (publishedVersion)
  • Ghent University Academic Bibliography (Ghent University) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
Funders
  • National Science Foundation
  • Carnegie Mellon University
  • Defense Advanced Research Projects Agency
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Networks and Communications › IoT and Edge/Fog Computing
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Privacy-Preserving Technologies in Data
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Information Systems › Internet of Things and AI
Keywords
edge analytics, Internet of Things, cloudlets, video analysis, privacy preservation, video denoising, content-based indexing, federated systems, access control, smart environments, bandwidth reduction

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review