Cited by 31Ethics and Social Impacts of AISoftware Engineering Techniques and PracticesCareer Development and Diversity

The Diversity Crisis of Software Engineering for Artificial Intelligence

Adams, Bram, Khomh, Foutse·2020·IEEE Software

Abstract

Artificial Intelligence (AI) is experiencing a "diversity crisis."1 Several reports1-3 have shown how the breakthrough of modern AI has not yet been able to improve on existing diversity challenges regarding gender, race, geography, and other factors, neither for the end users of those products nor the companies and organizations building them. Plenty of examples have surfaced in which biased data engineering practices or existing data sets led to incorrect, painful, or sometimes even harmful consequences for unassuming end users.4 The problem is that ruling out such biases is not straightforward due to the sheer number of different bias types.5 To have a chance to eliminate as many biases as possible, most of the experts agree that the teams and organizations building AI products should be made more diverse.1-3 This harkens back to Linus' law6 for open source development ("given enough eyeballs, all bugs are shallow") but applied to the development process of AI products.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1109/ms.2020.2975075

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Adams, B., & Khomh, F.
Affiliations
  • Ghent University (BE)
  • Polytechnique Montréal (CA)
Venue
IEEE Software
Published
2020-09
Volume
37
Issue
5
Pages
104-108
ISSN
  • 0740-7459 (ISSN-L)
  • 1937-4194
OpenAlex
W3081080629
Cited by
31
References
1
Citations by year
2026: 8 · 2025: 8 · 2024: 8 · 2023: 5 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 1
FWCI
2.39
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • IEEE Software (publishedVersion)
  • PolyPublie (École Polytechnique de Montréal) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Safety Research › Ethics and Social Impacts of AI
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Information Systems › Software Engineering Techniques and Practices
  • Social Sciences › Safety Research › Career Development and Diversity
Keywords
artificial intelligence, algorithmic bias, gender diversity, racial diversity, geographic diversity, data bias, open source software development

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review