The Diversity Crisis of Software Engineering for Artificial Intelligence
Abstract
Artificial Intelligence (AI) is experiencing a "diversity crisis."1 Several reports1-3 have shown how the breakthrough of modern AI has not yet been able to improve on existing diversity challenges regarding gender, race, geography, and other factors, neither for the end users of those products nor the companies and organizations building them. Plenty of examples have surfaced in which biased data engineering practices or existing data sets led to incorrect, painful, or sometimes even harmful consequences for unassuming end users.4 The problem is that ruling out such biases is not straightforward due to the sheer number of different bias types.5 To have a chance to eliminate as many biases as possible, most of the experts agree that the teams and organizations building AI products should be made more diverse.1-3 This harkens back to Linus' law6 for open source development ("given enough eyeballs, all bugs are shallow") but applied to the development process of AI products.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
A lack of diversity has been present throughout modern AI's development.
“A lack of diversity has been present throughout modern AI's development (Adams & Khomh, 2020).”
From The Future of Artificial Intelligence in Special Education Technology (2023) · cites this paper as Adams & Khomh, 2020
Cites
Horvitz, E. (2017) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.aao2466 · Cited by 42 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
The Future of Artificial Intelligence in Special Education Technology
Marino, M. T., Vasquez, E., Dieker, L., Basham, J., & Blackorby, J. (2023) · Journal of Special Education Technology · doi:10.1177/01626434231165977 · Cited by 142 · see citing works
- Authors
- Adams, B., & Khomh, F.
- Affiliations
- Ghent University (BE)
- Polytechnique Montréal (CA)
- Venue
- IEEE Software
- Published
- 2020-09
- Volume
- 37
- Issue
- 5
- Pages
- 104-108
- ISSN
- 0740-7459 (ISSN-L)
- 1937-4194
- OpenAlex
- W3081080629
- Cited by
- 31
- References
- 1
- Citations by year
- 2026: 8 · 2025: 8 · 2024: 8 · 2023: 5 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 1
- FWCI
- 2.39
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Licence
- Locations
- IEEE Software (publishedVersion)
- PolyPublie (École Polytechnique de Montréal) (submittedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Safety Research › Ethics and Social Impacts of AI
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Information Systems › Software Engineering Techniques and Practices
- Social Sciences › Safety Research › Career Development and Diversity
- Keywords
- artificial intelligence, algorithmic bias, gender diversity, racial diversity, geographic diversity, data bias, open source software development
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review