Cited by 33Retirement, Disability, and EmploymentGenerational Differences and TrendsAging and Gerontology Research

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Is 40 the New 60? How Popular Media Portrays the Employability of Older Software Developers

Open access

Abstract

We studied the public discourse around age and software development, focusing on the United States. This work was designed to build awareness among decision makers in software projects to help them anticipate and mitigate challenges that their older employees may face.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1109/ms.2020.3014178

Cites

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • We have presented how behavior change models can be used in agile contexts to change behavior of certain agile roles in a previous study [58].

    “we have presented how behavior change models can be used in agile contexts to change the behavior of certain agile roles in a theory-based previous study of us [58].”

    From A Framework for Emotion-Oriented Requirements Change Handling in Agile Software Engineering (2023) · cites this paper as [58]

    The Analyzing the Public Discourse section describes coding articles about older developers’ employability, and the Conclusion discusses employability strategies. Searches for behavior change models and agile roles found no passage describing their use in an agile-context study. The indexed passages provide no page numbers. (LLM, conf=0.76)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

No references could be resolved yet.

Research works printed but not linked: 19

  1. 10.1109/VLHCC.2016.7739681 · DOI
  2. 10.1017/S0144686X06005605 · DOI
  3. 10.1017/S0144686X0800768X · DOI
  4. 10.1007/s11556-008-0034-5 · DOI
  5. 10.1145/1796900.1796912 · DOI
  6. 10.1108/02610150110786859 · DOI
  7. 2020, Age discrimination
  8. holley, 2020, In Silicon Valley, some men say cosmetic procedures are essential to a career, The Washington Post
  9. 10.1109/VLHCC.2019.8818836 · DOI
  10. 2020, How do you evaluate Huawei’s “cleaning” of employees over 34 years old in early 2017?
  11. 10.1093/acrefore/9780190228613.013.436 · DOI
  12. 2018, Is 30 years old too old to learn computer programming?
  13. 10.1145/3236024.3236061 · DOI
  14. 10.1037/a0016901 · DOI
  15. 2020, Labor Force Statistics from the Current Population Survey
  16. 2020, Ageing
  17. samuel, 2017, Young people are just smarter, Psychology Today
  18. hern, 2019, Google pays $11m to jobseekers who alleged age discrimination, The Guardian
  19. 10.1109/VLHCC.2014.6883029 · DOI

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Baltes, S., Park, G., & Serebrenik, A.
Affiliations
  • QAware Gmb, Germany
  • Software Engineering, Itility B.V.
  • Eindhoven University of Technology (NL)
Venue
IEEE Software
Published
2020-11
Volume
37
Issue
6
Pages
26-31
ISSN
  • 0740-7459 (ISSN-L)
  • 1937-4194
OpenAlex
W3015797599
Cited by
33
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 4 · 2025: 8 · 2024: 8 · 2023: 9 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 1 · 2020: 1
FWCI
5.07
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • IEEE Software (publishedVersion)
  • TU/e Research Portal (publishedVersion, other-oa)
  • arXiv (Cornell University) (submittedVersion)
  • TU/e Research Portal (submittedVersion, other-oa)
  • arXiv (Cornell University)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Demography › Retirement, Disability, and Employment
  • Social Sciences › Life-span and Life-course Studies › Generational Differences and Trends
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Developmental and Educational Psychology › Aging and Gerontology Research
Keywords
employability, age discrimination, media representation, aging workforce, software development workforce

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review