Cited by 51Advanced Steganography and Watermarking TechniquesVideo Coding and Compression TechnologiesChaos-based Image/Signal Encryption

End-To-End Security for Video Distribution: The Combination of Encryption, Watermarking, and Video Adaptation

Open access
Boho, Andras, Van Wallendael, Glenn, Dooms, Ann, De Cock, Jan, Braeckman, Geert, Schelkens, Peter, Preneel, Bart, Van de Walle, Rik·2013·IEEE Signal Processing Magazine

Abstract

This article introduces the reader to the relevant techniques that are needed to implement such an end-to-end commutative security system for video distribution and presents a practical solution for encryption and watermarking compliant with H.264/Advanced Video Coding (AVC) and the upcoming High Efficiency Video Coding (HEVC) video coding standards. To minimize the overhead and visual impact, a practical tradeoff between the security of the encryption routine, robust watermarking, and transcoding possibilities is investigated. We demonstrate that our combined commutative protection system effectively scrambles video streams, achieving structural similarity index (SSIM) values below 0.2 across a range of practical bit rates, while allowing robust watermarking and transcoding.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1109/msp.2012.2230220

Cites

27 of 27 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Full encryption (naïve encryption) may result in significant performance overhead, especially if software-only encryption occurs.

    “Consequently, it may result in a significant performance overhead, especially if software-only encryption occurs [7].”

    From Effectiveness of crypto-transcoding for H.264/AVC and HEVC video bit-streams (2019) · cites this paper as [7]

    “Oceans of choices for video scrambling” identifies encrypting the whole encoded bitstream as the naïve approach. But the passages do not say that this approach causes significant performance overhead or that software-only encryption makes such overhead worse; the overhead discussed in the Abstract concerns the proposed system, not that comparison. No page numbers are available in our copy. (LLM, conf=0.75)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • Selective encryption reduces the amount of data encrypted compared to full encryption.

    “compared to full encryption, with selective encryption (SE) [8] not only is the amount of data encrypted reduced”
  • Some forms of selective encryption are decoder format-compatible.

    “but some forms of SE are decoder format-compatible.”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

1 of the 28 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Research works printed but not linked: 2

  1. K. Gopalakrishnan, N. Memon and P.L. Vora. "Protocols for watermark verifi- cation". IEEE Multimedia, Vol. 8 (4), pp. 66-70, October 2001.
  2. R.L. Lagendijk, Z. Erkin and M. Barni. "Encrypted Signal Processing for Privacy Protection". IEEE Signal Processing Magazine, January 2013.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Boho, A., Van Wallendael, G., Dooms, A., De Cock, J., Braeckman, G., Schelkens, P., Preneel, B., & Van de Walle, R.
Affiliations
Vrije Universiteit Brussel (BE)
Venue
IEEE Signal Processing Magazine
Published
2013-03
Volume
30
Issue
2
Pages
97-107
ISSN
1053-5888 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2135791560
Cited by
51
References
28
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 1 · 2023: 1 · 2021: 7 · 2020: 4 · 2019: 5 · 2018: 7 · 2017: 5 · 2016: 5 · 2015: 7 · 2014: 6 · 2013: 2
FWCI
7.50
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • IEEE Signal Processing Magazine (publishedVersion)
  • Ghent University Academic Bibliography (Ghent University) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
  • Lirias (submittedVersion, other-oa)
  • VUBIR (Vrije Universiteit Brussel) (submittedVersion)
Funders
  • Fonds Wetenschappelijk Onderzoek
  • iMinds
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition › Advanced Steganography and Watermarking Techniques
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Signal Processing › Video Coding and Compression Technologies
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition › Chaos-based Image/Signal Encryption
Keywords
video encryption, digital watermarking, video adaptation, video transcoding, H.264/AVC, HEVC, structural similarity index, video scrambling

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review