Cited by 190Ethics and Social Impacts of AIFlooding and Environmental ImpactPrivacy, Security, and Data Protection

The Menlo Report

Bailey, Michael, Dittrich, David, Kenneally, Erin, Maughan, Doug·2012·IEEE Security & Privacy Magazine

Abstract

On 28 December 2011, the US Department of Homeland Security, Science and Technology, Cyber Security Division released "The Menlo Report: Ethical Principles Guiding Information and Communication Technology Research" to the Federal Register to elicit the public's feedback. In this article, the authors briefly describe the road to this milestone, summarize the report and its companion document, and describe the next steps we should take as a community.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1109/msp.2012.52

Cites

3 of 3 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Bailey, M., Dittrich, D., Kenneally, E., & Maughan, D.
Affiliations
  • University of Michigan (US)
  • University of Washington (US)
  • University of California San Diego (US)
Venue
IEEE Security & Privacy Magazine
Published
2012-03
Volume
10
Issue
2
Pages
71-75
ISSN
1540-7993 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W1984487609
Cited by
190
References
3
Citations by year
2026: 34 · 2025: 39 · 2024: 32 · 2023: 32 · 2022: 11 · 2021: 9 · 2020: 7 · 2019: 5 · 2018: 3 · 2017: 6 · 2016: 3 · 2015: 3 · 2014: 5 · 2013: 1
FWCI
7.48
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
IEEE Security & Privacy (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Safety Research › Ethics and Social Impacts of AI
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Flooding and Environmental Impact
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Privacy, Security, and Data Protection
Keywords
ethical principles, research ethics, public comment, Department of Homeland Security

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review