Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 456

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 3 of the 3 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

A Signal Processing Perspective on Hyperspectral Unmixing: Insights from Remote Sensing

Open access
Ma, Wing-Kin, Bioucas-Dias, Jose M., Chan, Tsung-Han, Gillis, Nicolas, Gader, Paul, Plaza, Antonio J., Ambikapathi, ArulMurugan, Chi, Chong-Yung·2014·IEEE Signal Processing Magazine

Abstract

Blind hyperspectral unmixing (HU), also known as unsupervised HU, is one of the most prominent research topics in signal processing (SP) for hyperspectral remote sensing [1], [2]. Blind HU aims at identifying materials present in a captured scene, as well as their compositions, by using high spectral resolution of hyperspectral images. It is a blind source separation (BSS) problem from a SP viewpoint. Research on this topic started in the 1990s in geoscience and remote sensing [3]?[7], enabled by technological advances in hyperspectral sensing at the time. In recent years, blind HU has attracted much interest from other fields such as SP, machine learning, and optimization, and the subsequent cross-disciplinary research activities have made blind HU a vibrant topic. The resulting impact is not just on remote sensing?blind HU has provided a unique problem scenario that inspired researchers from different fields to devise novel blind SP methods. In fact, one may say that blind HU has established a new branch of BSS approaches not seen in classical BSS studies. In particular, the convex geometry concepts?discovered by early remote sensing researchers through empirical observations [3]?[7] and refined by later research?are elegant and very different from statistical independence-based BSS approaches established in the SP field. Moreover, the latest research on blind HU is rapidly adopting advanced techniques, such as those in sparse SP and optimization. The present development of blind HU seems to be converging to a point where the lines between remote sensing-originated ideas and advanced SP and optimization concepts are no longer clear, and insights from both sides would be used to establish better methods.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1109/msp.2013.2279731

Cites

3 of 3 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 3 references

Cited by

See all 456

Metadata

Authors
Ma, W.-K., Bioucas-Dias, J. M., Chan, T.-H., Gillis, N., Gader, P., Plaza, A. J., Ambikapathi, A., & Chi, C.-Y.
Venue
IEEE Signal Processing Magazine
Published
2014-01
Volume
31
Issue
1
Pages
67-81
ISSN
1053-5888 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2063790512
Cited by
456
References
3
FWCI
75.76
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
green

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: A Signal Processing Perspective on Hyperspectral Unmixing: Insights from Remote Sensing. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1109/msp.2013.2279731
The paper
Ma, W.-K., Bioucas-Dias, J. M., Chan, T.-H., Gillis, N., Gader, P., Plaza, A. J., Ambikapathi, A., & Chi, C.-Y. (2014). A Signal Processing Perspective on Hyperspectral Unmixing: Insights from Remote Sensing. IEEE Signal Processing Magazine. https://doi.org/10.1109/msp.2013.2279731

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.