The DOI matches its Crossref record; 113 of the 113 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Speaker Recognition by Machines and Humans: A tutorial review
Abstract
Identifying a person by his or her voice is an important human trait most take for granted in natural human-to-human interaction/communication. Speaking to someone over the telephone usually begins by identifying who is speaking and, at least in cases of familiar speakers, a subjective verification by the listener that the identity is correct and the conversation can proceed. Automatic speaker-recognition systems have emerged as an important means of verifying identity in many e-commerce applications as well as in general business interactions, forensics, and law enforcement. Human experts trained in forensic speaker recognition can perform this task even better by examining a set of acoustic, prosodic, and linguistic characteristics of speech in a general approach referred to as structured listening. Techniques in forensic speaker recognition have been developed for many years by forensic speech scientists and linguists to help reduce any potential bias or preconceived understanding as to the validity of an unknown audio sample and a reference template from a potential suspect. Experienced researchers in signal processing and machine learning continue to develop automatic algorithms to effectively perform speaker recognition?with ever-improving performance?to the point where automatic systems start to perform on par with human listeners. In this article, we review the literature on speaker recognition by machines and humans, with an emphasis on prominent speaker-modeling techniques that have emerged in the last decade for automatic systems. We discuss different aspects of automatic systems, including voice-activity detection (VAD), features, speaker models, standard evaluation data sets, and performance metrics. Human speaker recognition is discussed in two parts?the first part involves forensic speaker-recognition methods, and the second illustrates how a na?ve listener performs this task from a neuroscience perspective. We conclude this review with a comparative study of human versus machine speaker recognition and attempt to point out strengths and weaknesses of each.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Cortes, C., & Vapnik, V. (1995) · Machine Learning · doi:10.1007/bf00994018 · Cited by 59,421
Maximum Likelihood from Incomplete Data Via the EM Algorithm
Dempster, A. P., Laird, N. M., & Rubin, D. B. (1977) · Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series B: Statistical Methodology · doi:10.1111/j.2517-6161.1977.tb01600.x · Cited by 50,444
Representation Learning: A Review and New Perspectives
Bengio, Y., Courville, A., & Vincent, P. (2013) · IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence · doi:10.1109/tpami.2013.50 · Cited by 13,001
Hinton, G., Deng, L., Yu, D., Dahl, G., Mohamed, A.-R., Jaitly, N., Senior, A., Vanhoucke, V., Nguyen, P., Sainath, T., et al. (2012) · IEEE Signal Processing Magazine · doi:10.1109/msp.2012.2205597 · Cited by 10,260
Davis, S., & Mermelstein, P. (1980) · IEEE Transactions on Acoustics, Speech, and Signal Processing · doi:10.1109/tassp.1980.1163420 · Cited by 5,465
Speaker Verification Using Adapted Gaussian Mixture Models
Reynolds, D. A., Quatieri, T. F., & Dunn, R. B. (2000) · Digital Signal Processing · doi:10.1006/dspr.1999.0361 · Cited by 4,268
Front-End Factor Analysis for Speaker Verification
Dehak, N., Kenny, P. J., Dehak, R., Dumouchel, P., & Ouellet, P. (2011) · IEEE Transactions on Audio, Speech, and Language Processing · doi:10.1109/tasl.2010.2064307 · Cited by 3,549
Context-dependent pre-trained deep neural networks for large-vocabulary speech recognition
Dahl, G. E., Yu, D., Deng, L., & Acero, A. (2012) · IEEE Transactions on Audio Speech and Language Processing · doi:10.1109/tasl.2011.2134090 · Cited by 3,011
Robust text-independent speaker identification using Gaussian mixture speaker models
Reynolds, D. A., & Rose, R. C. (1995) · IEEE Transactions on Speech and Audio Processing · doi:10.1109/89.365379 · Cited by 2,860
Pattern recognition and machine learning
(2007) · Choice Reviews Online · doi:10.5860/choice.44-5091 · Cited by 2,650
Cited by
VoxCeleb2: Deep Speaker Recognition
Chung, J. S., Nagrani, A., & Zisserman, A. (2018) · Interspeech 2018 · doi:10.21437/interspeech.2018-1929 · Cited by 2,256
The ASVspoof 2017 challenge: assessing the limits of replay spoofing attack detection
Kinnunen, T., Sahidullah, M., Delgado, H., Todisco, M., Evans, N., Yamagishi, J., & Lee, K. A. (2017) · Interspeech 2017 · doi:10.21437/interspeech.2017-1111 · Cited by 535
Speaker recognition based on deep learning: An overview
Bai, Z., & Zhang, X.-L. (2021) · Neural Networks · doi:10.1016/j.neunet.2021.03.004 · Cited by 386
ASVspoof 2017 Version 2.0: meta-data analysis and baseline enhancements
Delgado, H., Todisco, M., Sahidullah, M., Evans, N., Kinnunen, T., Lee, K. A., & Yamagishi, J. (2018) · The Speaker and Language Recognition Workshop (Odyssey 2018) · doi:10.21437/odyssey.2018-42 · Cited by 178
Allen, N. B., Nelson, B. W., Brent, D., & Auerbach, R. P. (2019) · Journal of Affective Disorders · doi:10.1016/j.jad.2019.03.044 · Cited by 115
Metadata
- Authors
- Hansen, J. H. L., & Hasan, T.
- Venue
- IEEE Signal Processing Magazine
- Published
- 2015-11
- Volume
- 32
- Issue
- 6
- Pages
- 74-99
- ISSN
- 1053-5888 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W1936725236
- Cited by
- 621
- References
- 113
- FWCI
- 39.10
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Speaker Recognition by Machines and Humans: A tutorial review. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1109/msp.2015.2462851
- The paper
- Hansen, J. H. L., & Hasan, T. (2015). Speaker Recognition by Machines and Humans: A tutorial review. IEEE Signal Processing Magazine. https://doi.org/10.1109/msp.2015.2462851
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.