Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 369

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 57 of the 57 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Connecting the Dots: Identifying Network Structure via Graph Signal Processing

Open access
Mateos, Gonzalo, Segarra, Santiago, Marques, Antonio G., Ribeiro, Alejandro·2019·IEEE Signal Processing Magazine

Abstract

Network topology inference is a significant problem in network science. Most graph signal processing (GSP) efforts to date assume that the underlying network is known and then analyze how the graph?s algebraic and spectral characteristics impact the properties of the graph signals of interest. Such an assumption is often untenable beyond applications dealing with, e.g., directly observable social and infrastructure networks; and typically adopted graph construction schemes are largely informal, distinctly lacking an element of validation. This article offers an overview of graph-learning methods developed to bridge the aforementioned gap, by using information available from graph signals to infer the underlying graph topology. Fairly mature statistical approaches are surveyed first, where correlation analysis takes center stage along with its connections to covariance selection and high-dimensional regression for learning Gaussian graphical models. Recent GSP-based network inference frameworks are also described, which postulate that the network exists as a latent underlying structure and that observations are generated as a result of a network process defined in such a graph. A number of arguably more nascent topics are also briefly outlined, including inference of dynamic networks and nonlinear models of pairwise interaction, as well as extensions to directed (di) graphs and their relation to causal inference. All in all, this article introduces readers to challenges and opportunities for SP research in emerging topic areas at the crossroads of modeling, prediction, and control of complex behavior arising in networked systems that evolve over time.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1109/msp.2018.2890143

Cites

57 of 57 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 57 references

Cited by

See all 369

Metadata

Authors
Mateos, G., Segarra, S., Marques, A. G., & Ribeiro, A.
Venue
IEEE Signal Processing Magazine
Published
2019-05
Volume
36
Issue
3
Pages
16-43
ISSN
  • 1053-5888 (ISSN-L)
  • 1558-0792
OpenAlex
W2994097903
Cited by
369
References
57
FWCI
22.79
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
green

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Connecting the Dots: Identifying Network Structure via Graph Signal Processing. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1109/msp.2018.2890143
The paper
Mateos, G., Segarra, S., Marques, A. G., & Ribeiro, A. (2019). Connecting the Dots: Identifying Network Structure via Graph Signal Processing. IEEE Signal Processing Magazine. https://doi.org/10.1109/msp.2018.2890143

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.