Cited by 9Utopian, Dystopian, and Speculative FictionLiterary and Philosophical StudiesEthics and Social Impacts of AI

When robots decide to kill

Guizzo, Erico, Ackerman, Evan·2016·IEEE Spectrum

Abstract

CZECH WRITER KAREL CAPEK'S 1920 play R.U.R. (Rossum's Universal Robots), which famously introduced the word robot to the world, begins with synthetic humans-the robots from the title-toiling in factories to produce low-cost goods. It ends with those same robots killing off the human race. Thus was born an enduring plot line in science fiction: robots spiraling out of control and turning into unstoppable killing machines. Twentieth-century literature and film would go on to bring us many more examples of robots wreaking havoc on the world, with Hollywood notably turning the theme into blockbuster franchises like The Matrix, Transformers, and The Terminator.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1109/mspec.2016.7473151

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Guizzo, E., & Ackerman, E.
Affiliations
  • University of South Carolina (US)
  • National Institute of Standards and Technology (US)
Venue
IEEE Spectrum
Published
2016-06
Volume
53
Issue
6
Pages
38-43
ISSN
0018-9235 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2399352817
Cited by
9
References
0
Citations by year
2023: 2 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 2 · 2020: 1 · 2019: 1 · 2017: 1
FWCI
4.14
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
IEEE Spectrum (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Philosophy › Utopian, Dystopian, and Speculative Fiction
  • Social Sciences › Political Science and International Relations › Literary and Philosophical Studies
  • Social Sciences › Safety Research › Ethics and Social Impacts of AI
Keywords
autonomous weapons, AI ethics, military robotics, science fiction, R.U.R., human-robot conflict

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review