Cited by 17Traffic Prediction and Management TechniquesTransportation Planning and OptimizationUrban Transport Systems Analysis

Bus Journey and Arrival Time Prediction based on Archived AVL/GPS data using Machine Learning

Taparia, Ankit, Brady, Mike·2021·2021 7th International Conference on Models and Technologies for Intelligent Transportation Systems (MT-ITS)

Abstract

With a surge in the number of vehicles, urban traffic congestion has increased in recent years. This has led to increased travel times and decreased accessibility and mobility. One option to mitigate this issue is to promote the use of public transport, including buses. To encourage the use of buses, there is a need to provide reliable travel time and arrival information to commuters.In this study, we propose and develop predictive models to predict bus journey and arrival times based on historical AVL/GPS data, bus route and bus stop information. There were two parts to this study. The first was to predict overall journey times and the second was to predict bus arrival times at bus stops.To estimate total bus journey times, three models were developed using Linear Regression, Artificial Neural Network (ANN) and Long Short Term Memory Network (LSTM). Evaluation on a ground-truth dataset shows that LSTM outperformed the Linear Regression model and its performance was comparable to that of ANN. To predict bus arrival times at bus stops, three different models, namely Historical Averaging, Linear Regression and Gradient Boosting are proposed. Experimental results show that Gradient Boosting outperformed the other models and is more robust in predicting arrival times.Our study supports the idea that it is possible to predict bus journey time with reasonable accuracy using historical GPS observations and bus route information only.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1109/mt-its49943.2021.9529328

Cites

19 of 19 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 4

  1. seng, 2015, Bus arrival time prediction based on static and dynamic algorithms, Journal of Advances in Transportation Studies
  2. 0, Dublin Bus GPS Data
  3. lowe, 2009, Public transit buses A green choice gets greener
  4. 2020, TomTom Traffic Index

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Taparia, A., & Brady, M.
Affiliations
Trinity College Dublin (IE)
Venue
2021 7th International Conference on Models and Technologies for Intelligent Transportation Systems (MT-ITS)
Publisher
IEEE
Published
2021-06-16
Pages
1-6
OpenAlex
W3196292270
Cited by
16
References
18
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 7 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 4 · 2022: 1
FWCI
4.09
Type
conference paper
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
International Conference on Models and Technologies for Intelligent Transportation Systems (MT-ITS) (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Building and Construction › Traffic Prediction and Management Techniques
  • Social Sciences › Transportation › Transportation Planning and Optimization
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Civil and Structural Engineering › Urban Transport Systems Analysis
Keywords
bus arrival time prediction, GPS data, public transport, urban traffic congestion, bus route information, bus stops, gradient boosting, LSTM, linear regression

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review