Cited by 20Electromagnetic Compatibility and Noise SuppressionElectromagnetic Compatibility and MeasurementsIoT Networks and Protocols

Electromagnetic Interference Analysis of Industrial IoT Networks: From Legacy Systems to 5G

Open access
Dionisio, Rogerio, Lolic, Teodora, Torres, Pedro·2020·2020 IEEE Microwave Theory and Techniques in Wireless Communications (MTTW)

Abstract

The presence of Industrial IoT systems on the factory shop floor in recent years, are becoming an attractive solution with many advantages, including flexibility, low cost and easy deployment. As more and more devices are wirelessly connected, spectral noise level increases and consequently radio interference between IoT devices. In this paper, we present an agnostic methodology to assess radio interferences between different industrial IoT systems on the factory floor, using appropriate propagation models. Several interference scenarios are simulated, ranging from legacy systems to future communication standards implementations (5G). We highlight some of the challenges and open issues that still need to be addressed to decrease interference and make industrial wireless systems compatible.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1109/mttw51045.2020.9245057

Cites

8 of 8 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 9

  1. 2020, Understanding 5G Coexistence - Testing Requirements, Keysight White Paper
  2. 2020, TS 38.104 V16.4.0 (2020-06) - 3rd Generation Partnership Project; Technical Specification Group Radio Access Network; NR; Base Station (BS) radio transmission and reception (Release 16), ETSI Tech Rep
  3. 2017, Guidelines for evaluation of radio interface technologies for IMT-2020, ITU Draft 557 rev1
  4. 0, Spectrum Engineering Advanced Monte Carlo Analysis Tool (SEAMCAT)
  5. mennig, 2019, 5G in Production, Umlaut Tech Rep
  6. 2020, TS 138 101-1 V15.10.0(2020-07), Technical Specifications: ”5G; NR; User Equipment (UE) radio transmission and reception; Part 1: Range 1 Standalone (Release 15), ETSI Tech Rep
  7. alzin, 2019, 5G: Is the industry ready? - Study about the preparedness of industry for 5G, HMS industrial Networks Tech Rep
  8. 2019, ACAI Tech Rep
  9. 2016, Opinion of the RSC pursuant to Advisory Procedure under Article 4 of Regulation 182/2011/EU and Article 4.2 of Radio Spectrum Decision 676/2002/EC, European Commision CEPT Mandate RSCOM16-40rev3

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Dionisio, R., Lolic, T., & Torres, P.
Affiliations
Universidade Politécnica de Castelo Branco (PT)
Venue
2020 IEEE Microwave Theory and Techniques in Wireless Communications (MTTW)
Publisher
IEEE
Published
2020-10-01
Pages
41-46
OpenAlex
W3094819716
Cited by
20
References
8
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 4 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 6 · 2021: 3
FWCI
4.22
Type
conference paper
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • IEEE Microwave Theory and Techniques in Wireless Communications (MTTW) (publishedVersion)
  • Portuguese National Funding Agency for Science, Research and Technology (RCAAP Project by FCT) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Electrical and Electronic Engineering › Electromagnetic Compatibility and Noise Suppression
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Electrical and Electronic Engineering › Electromagnetic Compatibility and Measurements
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Electrical and Electronic Engineering › IoT Networks and Protocols
Keywords
Industrial Internet of Things, radio frequency interference, electromagnetic interference, 5G, propagation models, interference mitigation, spectral noise

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review