Cited by 30Smart Grid Security and ResilienceAdversarial Robustness in Machine LearningWireless Communication Security Techniques

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 15 of the 15 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Digital Twin for Wireless Networks: Security Attacks and Solutions

Wang, Weizheng, Yang, Yaoqi, Khan, Latif U., Niyato, Dusit, Han, Zhu, Guizani, Mohsen·2024·IEEE Wireless Communications

Abstract

Emerging applications (e.g., human-computer interaction, digital healthcare, and intelligent transportation systems) can be effectively enabled using digital twins (DTs) that combine the virtual model of a physical system with other technologies/ schemes (i.e., mathematical optimization, game theory, and machine learning). Although DTs can well enable wireless systems, they will suffer from various security attacks. Therefore, this article presents an overview of security attacks and concerns in a DT-enabled wireless system. We propose a general framework that will serve as guidelines for future DT-enabled wireless systems. Additionally, we present two use cases to show the effectiveness of the proposed framework. A Stackelberg game-enabled model is provided to effectively enable anti-jamming attacks. In addition a residual- enabled reweighting aggregation scheme furnishes robust training against flawed parameters. Finally, we present an outlook on future directions.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1109/mwc.020.2200609

Cites

15 of 15 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • In wireless networks, DTs are susceptible to attacks, requiring security solutions such as Stackelberg game-based models for anti-jamming and residual-enabled reweighting aggregation methods.

    “In wireless networks, DTs are susceptible to attacks, requiring security solutions such as Stackelberg game-based models for anti-jamming and residual-enabled reweighting aggregation methods to improve training resilience against incorrect parameters [114].”

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Wang, W., Yang, Y., Khan, L. U., Niyato, D., Han, Z., & Guizani, M.
Affiliations
  • City University of Hong Kong (HK)
  • PLA Army Engineering University (CN)
  • Mohamed bin Zayed University of Artificial Intelligence (AE)
  • Nanyang Technological University (SG)
  • University of Houston,USA
Venue
IEEE Wireless Communications
Published
2024-06
Volume
31
Issue
3
Pages
278-285
ISSN
  • 1536-1284 (ISSN-L)
  • 1558-0687
OpenAlex
W4388819599
Cited by
30
References
15
Citations by year
2026: 8 · 2025: 16 · 2024: 6
FWCI
3.22
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • IEEE Wireless Communications (publishedVersion)
  • DR-NTU (Nanyang Technological University) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Control and Systems Engineering › Smart Grid Security and Resilience
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Adversarial Robustness in Machine Learning
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Electrical and Electronic Engineering › Wireless Communication Security Techniques
Keywords
digital twin, wireless networks, security attacks, anti-jamming, Stackelberg game, robust training

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review