The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Intrusion detection using deep belief networks
Abstract
With the advent of digital technology, security threats for computer networks have increased dramatically over the last decade being much bolder and brazen. There is a great need for an effective Intrusion Detection System (IDS) which are intelligent specialized system designed to interpret the intrusion attempts in incoming network traffic. Deep belief neural (DBN) networks proved to be the most influential deep neural nets and generative neural networks that stack Restricted Boltzmann Machines. In this paper, we explore the capabilities of DBN's performing intrusion detection through series of experiments after training it with NSL-KDD dataset. The trained DBN network now identifies any kind of unknown attack in dataset supplied to it and to the best of our knowledge this is first comprehensive paper performing intrusion detection using deep belief nets. The proposed system not only detect attacks but also classify them in five groups with the accuracy of identifying and classifying network activity based on limited, incomplete, and nonlinear data sources. The proposed system achieved detection accuracy about 97.5% for only fifty iterations that is state of art performance compare to the existing system till today for intrusion detection.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
A fast learning algorithm for deep belief nets
Hinton, G. E., Osindero, S., & Teh, Y.-W. (2006) · Neural Computation · doi:10.1162/neco.2006.18.7.1527 · Cited by 16,336
Training Products of Experts by Minimizing Contrastive Divergence
Hinton, G. E. (2002) · Neural Computation · doi:10.1162/089976602760128018 · Cited by 4,879 · cited 5×
“The details explanation of Restricted Boltzmann Machine (RBM) and 978-1-4673-7565-8/15/$31.00 ©2015 IEEE 339 Deep Belief Network (DBN) is given in Section IV and V respectively.”
MethodInfluential
Cited by
A State-of-the-Art Survey on Deep Learning Theory and Architectures
Alom, M. Z., Taha, T. M., Yakopcic, C., Westberg, S., Sidike, P., Nasrin, M. S., Hasan, M., Van Essen, B. C., Awwal, A. A. S., & Asari, V. K. (2019) · Electronics · doi:10.3390/electronics8030292 · Cited by 1,620
Self-citationMachine Learning and Deep Learning Methods for Cybersecurity
Xin, Y., Kong, L., Liu, Z., Chen, Y., Li, Y., Zhu, H., Gao, M., Hou, H., & Wang, C. (2018) · IEEE Access · doi:10.1109/access.2018.2836950 · Cited by 1,228
Boutaba, R., Salahuddin, M. A., Limam, N., Ayoubi, S., Shahriar, N., Estrada-Solano, F., & Caicedo, O. M. (2018) · Journal of Internet Services and Applications · doi:10.1186/s13174-018-0087-2 · Cited by 1,036
Deep Learning for Intelligent Wireless Networks: A Comprehensive Survey
Mao, Q., Hu, F., & Hao, Q. (2018) · IEEE Communications Surveys & Tutorials · doi:10.1109/comst.2018.2846401 · Cited by 789
A Survey of Deep Learning Methods for Cyber Security
Berman, D. S., Buczak, A. L., Chavis, J. S., & Corbett, C. L. (2019) · Information · doi:10.3390/info10040122 · Cited by 569
Metadata
- Authors
- Alom, M. Z., Bontupalli, V., & Taha, T. M.
- Venue
- 2015 National Aerospace and Electronics Conference (NAECON)
- Publisher
- IEEE
- Published
- 2015-06
- Pages
- 339-344
- OpenAlex
- W2541841318
- Cited by
- 254
- References
- 2
- FWCI
- 9.99
- Type
- conference paper
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Intrusion detection using deep belief networks. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1109/naecon.2015.7443094
- The paper
- Alom, M. Z., Bontupalli, V., & Taha, T. M. (2015). Intrusion detection using deep belief networks. 2015 National Aerospace and Electronics Conference (NAECON). https://doi.org/10.1109/naecon.2015.7443094
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
