Cited by 569Network Security and Intrusion DetectionAdversarial Robustness in Machine LearningAdvanced Malware Detection Techniques

A Survey of Deep Learning Methods for Cyber Security

Open access
Berman, Daniel S., Buczak, Anna L., Chavis, Jeffrey S., Corbett, Cherita L.·2019·Information

Abstract

This survey paper describes a literature review of deep learning (DL) methods for cyber security applications. A short tutorial-style description of each DL method is provided, including deep autoencoders, restricted Boltzmann machines, recurrent neural networks, generative adversarial networks, and several others. Then we discuss how each of the DL methods is used for security applications. We cover a broad array of attack types including malware, spam, insider threats, network intrusions, false data injection, and malicious domain names used by botnets.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.3390/info10040122

Cites

17 of 17 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • DL has demonstrated advantages over conventional signature-based, rule-based, and classic ML solutions.

    “Indeed, DL has demonstrated advantages over conventional signature-based, rule-based, and classic ML solutions (Berman et al. 2019).”

    From Deepfakes: current and future trends (2024) · cites this paper as Berman et al. 2019

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Berman, D. S., Buczak, A. L., Chavis, J. S., & Corbett, C. L.
Affiliations
Johns Hopkins University Applied Physics Laboratory (US)
Corresponding author
Buczak, Anna L.
Venue
Information
Publisher
MDPI AG
Published
2019-04-02
Volume
10
Issue
4
Pages
122
ISSN
2078-2489 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2929803724
Cited by
569
References
17
Citations by year
2026: 44 · 2025: 72 · 2024: 74 · 2023: 87 · 2022: 95 · 2021: 109 · 2020: 76 · 2019: 12
FWCI
39.95
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Information (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
Funders
JST-Mirai Program
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Networks and Communications › Network Security and Intrusion Detection
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Adversarial Robustness in Machine Learning
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Signal Processing › Advanced Malware Detection Techniques
Keywords
deep learning for cybersecurity, deep autoencoder, restricted Boltzmann machine, recurrent neural networks, generative adversarial networks, malware detection, spam detection, insider threats, network intrusion detection, false data injection attacks, botnets, malicious domain names

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review