Cited by 16Electric Vehicles and InfrastructureOptimal Power Flow DistributionSmart Grid Energy Management

Probabilistic Impact Analysis of Residential Electric Vehicle Charging on Distribution Transformers

Palomino, Alejandro, Parvania, Masood·2018·2018 North American Power Symposium (NAPS)

Abstract

Transportation electrification by means of increasing plug-in electric vehicle (PEV) adoption presents both opportunities and challenges to power system operators. Although the electrification of transportation offers power utilities the opportunity to increase total load served in an era of flat year-over-year electricity sales, the sustainable integration of PEVs over the long term requires improved understanding of overload risks on existing power distribution systems. In this context, we propose a probabilistic model to study the impacts of residential PEV charging load on distribution systems. More specifically, the proposed model captures the uncertainty of PEV charging load and the uncertainty of residential customer load through Poisson and Gaussian distribution models respectively. These models are then utilized in a Monte Carlo simulation approach to calculate the statistical significance of resulting total load profiles and ultimately quantify the overloading risk levels on distribution transformers. The proposed model is utilized to study multiple PEV integration scenarios using residential customer load profile data of Salt Lake City and PEV charging load data available by Idaho National Laboratory.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1109/naps.2018.8600630

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • [142] introduced a voltage-constrained-based approach to calculate the HC of EVs under uncontrolled charging scenarios, while the authors in [144] considered both uncontrolled and controlled charging schemes.

    “Therefore, [142] introduced a voltage-constrained-based approach to calculate the HC of EVs under uncontrolled charging scenarios while the authors in [144] considered both uncontrolled and controlled charging schemes.”
  • To quantify the risk of overloading in the network, [144,145] capture the uncertainty of EV and customer loading using Poisson and Gaussian distribution models respectively.

    “To quantify the risk of overloading in the network, [144,145] capture the uncertainty of EV and customer loading using Poisson and Gaussian distribution models respectively.”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Palomino, A., & Parvania, M.
Affiliations
University of Utah (US)
Venue
2018 North American Power Symposium (NAPS)
Publisher
IEEE
Published
2018-09
Pages
1-6
OpenAlex
W2907037534
Cited by
16
References
1
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 2 · 2023: 5 · 2021: 2 · 2020: 4 · 2019: 1 · 2018: 1
FWCI
3.19
Type
conference paper
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
North American Power Symposium (NAPS) (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • U.S. Department of Energy
  • Idaho National Laboratory
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Electrical and Electronic Engineering › Electric Vehicles and Infrastructure
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Electrical and Electronic Engineering › Optimal Power Flow Distribution
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Electrical and Electronic Engineering › Smart Grid Energy Management
Keywords
plug-in electric vehicles, residential EV charging, distribution transformers, probabilistic load modeling, Poisson distribution, normal distribution, Monte Carlo simulation, electric mobility, electricity profile, distribution networks

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review