Cited by 79Electric Vehicles and InfrastructureTransportation Planning and OptimizationTransportation and Mobility Innovations

Electric vehicles: A review of network modelling and future research needs

Open access
Jing, Wentao, Yan, Yadan, Kim, Inhi, Sarvi, Majid·2016·Advances in Mechanical Engineering

Abstract

Electric vehicles are believed to be an effective solution for reducing greenhouse gas emissions. Despite extensive study on the attributes and characteristics of electric vehicles and their charging infrastructure design, the development and network modelling of electric vehicles are still evolving and limited. This article provides a comprehensive review of electric vehicle studies and identifies existing research gaps in the aspects of theories, modelling approaches, solution algorithms and applications. This article first describes the electric vehicles’ concepts, market share, characteristics and charging infrastructures. Then, the studies on traffic assignment problem with electric vehicles in the network and limited charging facilities are particularly discussed. We conclude that it is of great importance to take into account electric vehicles’ special characteristics (e.g. range limit) in predicting their routing behaviour and charging infrastructure design networks.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1177/1687814015627981

Cites

71 of 71 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The increase in EV models, different battery types, and lack of standardization make BESs not feasible because all vehicles served by BESs should use identical batteries.

    “However, the increase of the number of EV models, as well as the different types of batteries and the lack of standardization, are not making the use of BESs a feasible process, since all of the vehicles served by BES should use identical batteries [65].”

    From A Review on Electric Vehicles: Technologies and Challenges (2021) · cites this paper as [65]

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

1 of the 72 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Research works printed but not linked: 2

  1. OECD-ITF Joint Transport Research Centre. Green- house gas reduction strategies in the transport sector, 2008, pp.1-137, http://www.internationaltransportforu- m.org/pub/pdf/08ghg.pdf
  2. Botsford C and Szczepanek A. Fast charging vs. slow charging: pros and cons for the new age of electric vehi- cles. In: Proceedings of the EVS24 international battery, hybrid and fuel cell electric vehicle symposium, Stavanger, Norway, 13-16 May 2009, pp.1-9.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Jing, W., Yan, Y., Kim, I., & Sarvi, M.
Affiliations
  • Monash University (AU)
  • Zhengzhou University (CN)
Corresponding author
Yan, Yadan
Venue
Advances in Mechanical Engineering
Published
2016-01-01
Volume
8
Issue
1
ISSN
  • 1687-8132 (ISSN-L)
  • 1687-8140
OpenAlex
W2347198897
Cited by
79
References
72
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 8 · 2024: 8 · 2023: 8 · 2022: 11 · 2021: 16 · 2020: 8 · 2019: 5 · 2018: 7 · 2017: 5 · 2016: 1
FWCI
2.77
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Advances in Mechanical Engineering (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • Minerva Access (University of Melbourne) (submittedVersion)
  • Monash University Research Portal (Monash University) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
Funders
  • Monash University
  • National Natural Science Foundation of China (71501038)
  • Government of Jiangsu Province
  • Natural Science Foundation of Jiangsu Province (71501038, BK20150603)
  • Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities (2242015R30036)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Electrical and Electronic Engineering › Electric Vehicles and Infrastructure
  • Social Sciences › Transportation › Transportation Planning and Optimization
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Automotive Engineering › Transportation and Mobility Innovations
Keywords
electric vehicles, network modeling, traffic assignment, charging infrastructure, range limits, charging infrastructure design, greenhouse gas emissions reduction, research gaps

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review